Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

Gender and Rural Non-Farm Entrepreneurship

Decent Work and Economic GrowthGender Equality
  • For policymakers
  • Summary created: 2022

 Documenting differences in productivity of female and male entrepreneurs and analysing where they stem from.

This summary, including its recommendations and ideas, was created by Bob Rijkers and is based on original research. The original research itself was conducted in collaboration with the following researcher.

The study investigates specific cases in Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Indonesia to represent gender differences in firms across developing countries.

Share
Cite page
Rijkers, Bob. 'Gender and Rural Non-Farm Entrepreneurship'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/gender-and-rural-non-farm-entrepreneurship/

Insights

  • Female-headed enterprises are much less productive on average than male-headed enterprises, but this is largely a function of sorting: Women sort into activities that are typically less productive and run firms that are less capital-intensive.

    Once firm size and sector activity are accounted for, gender differences in productivity diminishes dramatically. Differences are largely a function of where women work and the type of activity they deploy.

  • These sorting differences are likely due to a range of factors including differences in cultural roles of men and women in these areas.
  • Returns to scale were not observed in these data; the key difference in productivity was the type of firm rather than the size.
  • Women’s economic performance is also constrained by activities in the household, for example better educated spouses appears associated with better access to capital.

    Interestingly, there was little evidence that inequities in human capital were significant factors in gender productivity differences.

  • Gender differences were not linked to returns to scale- while male owned firms are larger, there was not strong evidence of increasing returns to larger firms with greater capital intensity.
  • Participation differences between men and women varied between countries studied.

Proposed action

  • Neutralise household differences so that women without educated husbands have similar access to capital opportunities as those who do 
  • Work on ways to make more work activities more accessible and available to women
  • Liberation from domestic obligations could help women take on more lucrative work
  • Firm performance is very vulnerable to household shocks, so improved healthcare and targeted relief would be a significant difference-maker

Share your thoughts

You must be logged in to ask a question. Make an account.
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to iDE Global

These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

iDE Global Logo
Special thanks to Ben Levett for preparation assistance

We would like to extend a special thank you to Ben Levett, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Heads up: experience is better on desktop

You can use the site on your phone, but some features are easier on a laptop or desktop. We’re improving mobile soon.

Continue

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close