Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

The problem

Good intentions and brilliant ideas are not enough when the context is assumed

Every year, billions are invested in development programmes designed by people who care deeply. But their frame of reference is shaped by a different set of cultural, political, and social realities than the communities they serve.

In practice

What does an owl represent to you?

In some cultures, wisdom. In others, an omen of death. Use the wrong symbol in an education campaign and you lose community trust.

Because interpretation shapes how communities understand trust, authority, gender, risk – and what progress even means.

The structural gap

Decision makers are rarely from the communities they design for

Sometimes they are part of the same country’s diaspora.
Sometimes they have lived in the country.

Sometimes they rely on local staff, country experts, or trusted community representatives.

Often they have visited – but few have lived fully within the community.

Even when they have, they grew up within very different cultural, political, and social realities – and that shapes how they interpret what they see and hear, and what they perceive as best.

And communities are not monolithic.

They contain different identities, priorities, power dynamics, and tensions – and competing visions of what progress should look like.

Yet decisions are often shaped by whoever happens to be trusted, available, and already in the network – drastically limiting the perspectives considered.

The deeper contextual knowledge already exists – held by researchers and experts embedded in these communities. But it rarely reaches academic journals to shape discourse, let alone the rooms where decisions are made.

Who we are

Acume connects development professionals with researchers who deeply understand the contexts they work in.

We are building a global community of contextual experts – researchers who combine rigorous subject expertise with lived and field-based understanding of the places they study. Our platform is designed for NGOs and governments working in communities they are not from.

You can access expertise through:

Our values

We believe knowledge should represent the world it serves, be accessible to those who need it, and be generated by those closest to the problem.

Knowledge should have no barriers.

Our library is free, open, and written to be understood by the people who need it – not locked behind institutional access, complexity and lengthy text. 

Local knowledge is expert knowledge.

Research produced entirely within the Global South scores higher on rigour and relevance than research conducted from outside. Those closest to a problem are often best placed to solve it.

Representation is not a footnote.

84% of articles in the top 20 development journals were authored by researchers based in Europe and the USA. The knowledge shaping global development decisions is not global and diverse.

Our team

Yasmine Finbow

Founder

Shane Nolan

Tech Lead

Luuk Springintveld

Researcher

Advisory board

Ali Aljasem

Researcher

Arunn Jegan

Advocacy Coordinator

Curtis Raynold

Former Secretary

Dr Mark Siebert

Co-Founder

Dr Peter Matanle

Senior Lecturer, School of East Asian Studies

Gina Dumfries

Advisor on Strategic Growth

Liesbeth Rigter

Leadership Consultant

Special thanks

To those who gave their time to make Acume possible

Bela Ashworth
Anna Chadwell
Allegra Clark
Antoine Germain
Angelines Yaport-Garcia
Bruna Pellegrino
Caroline Rohr
Esther Feeken
Emma Spieler
Arianne Zajac
Ben Levett
Belén Martínez González
Jasmyn Spanswick
Jack Wilkinson
Jess Littman
Kirsti Sletten
Lina Lou
Margaux Baril
Meliha Verlasevic
Martin Haselhoff
Noemi Suter
Sim Hoekstra
Sem Jans
Peter Emerson
Smaranda Bob
Stefano Cisternino
Sophie Falshaw
Tyree Vasconcellos
William Green
Christina Takayama
Eva van der Pol
Maali Jamil
Phaedra Haringsma
Carmen Gabriela Lupu
Loretta Ati
Elise Sem Fa
Elise Granlie
Panos Koromvokis
Ramya Zwaal
Bianca de Groot

Start here

The communities most affected by development decisions are the least represented in the rooms where those decisions are made. Closing that gap is not just good practice. It is the whole point.

Sign up for a free account

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close