- For development
- Syria
- United States of America (USA)
From the PYD-YPG to the SDF: the Consolidation of Power in Kurdish-Controlled Northeast Syria
Based on:
Journal Article (2022) ↗
This research examines the consolidation of power of the PYD (the Kurdish governing actor in northern Syria), and the YPG ( the military wing).
Brief by:
Research collaborators:
The research traces the historical conditions & processes leading to the creation of the Kurdish-led PYD-YPG party, & explains factors enabling it to consolidate political-military power in northeastern Syria during the country’s civil war. It also traces the process whereby the PYD-YPG played a leading role in establishing the multi-ethnic SDF, through which it managed to forge an alliance with the USA as its principal “local partner force” in the international coalition fighting against Islamic State in Syria.
Key findings
Through its superior organisational skills and its ability to monopolise the means of violence after the Syrian government disintegrated in northeast Syria, the PYD-YPG successfully blocked rival Kurdish parties from competing for political-military power in this region.
The PYD-YPG's political-strategic astuteness meant they could avoid devastating military confrontations with the Assad's Syrian air force, thereby preserving their military strength and sparing the Syrian Kurdish population the worst consequences of the Syrian civil war.
In the fight against a formidable enemy like the Islamic State later in the civil war, the PYD-YPG was compelled to prioritise cooperative consolidation by forming alliances with Arab communities prepared to oppose ISIS.
The importance of maintaining cohesion and unity, through strict internal discipline, was a paramount factor in their successful consolidation of power.
The other key factor was the PYD-YPG's political-military success was the military support it secured from the USA.
This gave the PYD-YPG (under the umbrella of the SDF) the capacity to fight ISIS toe-to-toe, and win. This SDF-US alliance also permitted them to deflect "terrorist" labelling from Turkey.
The PYD-YPG initially relied on coercive consolidation against its main Kurdish rivals.
To secure local and international support against the Islamic State, it shifted to cooperative & cooptation strategies of power consolidation to enhance its internal and international legitimacy and popularity.
Proposed action
Policymakers and practitioners should be aware of their biases
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Acknowledgements
Thank you to KPSRL
These insights were made available thanks to the support of KPSRL, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.
Special thanks to Ramya Zwaal for preparation assistance
We would like to extend a special thank you to Ramya Zwaal, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Sponsored links
From the PYD-YPG to the SDF: the Consolidation of Power in Kurdish-Controlled Northeast Syria
Cite this brief: Fumerton, Mario. 'From the PYD-YPG to the SDF: the Consolidation of Power in Kurdish-Controlled Northeast Syria'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/from-the-pyd-ypg-to-the-sdf-the-consolidation-of-power-in-kurdish-controlled-northeast-syria/
Brief created by: Dr Mario Fumerton | Year brief made:
Original research:
- W. V. W., & Fumerton, M., ‘From the PYD-YPG to the SDF: the Consolidation of Power in Kurdish-Controlled Northeast Syria’ https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.2013758. – https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1080/1057610X.2021.2013758
Research brief:
This research examines the consolidation of power of the PYD (the Kurdish governing actor in northern Syria), and the YPG ( the military wing).
The research traces the historical conditions & processes leading to the creation of the Kurdish-led PYD-YPG party, & explains factors enabling it to consolidate political-military power in northeastern Syria during the country’s civil war. It also traces the process whereby the PYD-YPG played a leading role in establishing the multi-ethnic SDF, through which it managed to forge an alliance with the USA as its principal “local partner force” in the international coalition fighting against Islamic State in Syria.
Findings:
Through its superior organisational skills and its ability to monopolise the means of violence after the Syrian government disintegrated in northeast Syria, the PYD-YPG successfully blocked rival Kurdish parties from competing for political-military power in this region.
The PYD-YPG’s political-strategic astuteness meant they could avoid devastating military confrontations with the Assad’s Syrian air force, thereby preserving their military strength and sparing the Syrian Kurdish population the worst consequences of the Syrian civil war.
In the fight against a formidable enemy like the Islamic State later in the civil war, the PYD-YPG was compelled to prioritise cooperative consolidation by forming alliances with Arab communities prepared to oppose ISIS.
The importance of maintaining cohesion and unity, through strict internal discipline, was a paramount factor in their successful consolidation of power.
The other key factor was the PYD-YPG’s political-military success was the military support it secured from the USA.
This gave the PYD-YPG (under the umbrella of the SDF) the capacity to fight ISIS toe-to-toe, and win. This SDF-US alliance also permitted them to deflect “terrorist” labelling from Turkey.
The PYD-YPG initially relied on coercive consolidation against its main Kurdish rivals.
To secure local and international support against the Islamic State, it shifted to cooperative & cooptation strategies of power consolidation to enhance its internal and international legitimacy and popularity.
Advice:
Policymakers and practitioners should be aware of their biases
- For example, western organisations and governments often have negative biases against all non-state armed actors (like militias), labelling them as “terrorists” targeting civilians. These biased assumptions and perceptions closes off possibilities in policymaking. On the contrary, evidence shows that not all militias/local defence forces intentionally target civilians, with some instead providing local order, leadership, resilience, and livelihood opportunities during armed conflict.