- Brief created: 2025
- For policymakers
Nuclear in Our Lives
Based on:
Journal Article (2022) ↗
Investigates the interconnected existential threats posed by nuclear weapons, global heating, and biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need for collective action to ensure a sustainable future.
Brief by:
.jpg)
The paper highlights the historical and ongoing challenges of nuclear weapons, tracing back to the discovery of radiation in 1896 and the subsequent development of nuclear bombs, which culminated in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This period marked a significant transformation in science and politics, as the power of nuclear energy was realized. The Cold War era further complicated global politics, with the United States and the Soviet Union embroiled in an arms race, exacerbated by mistrust and the belief that nuclear deterrence was essential for national security. Despite the reduction of nuclear warheads from 24,876 in 1961 to 10,161 in 2015, the threat remains significant, with the Doomsday Clock now at 100 seconds to midnight, indicating the persistent danger of nuclear conflict.
The paper also discusses the broader implications of technological advancements, such as nuclear power and the internet, which were initially met with euphoria but later revealed dystopian potentials. The belief in technology as a savior often overshadows the need for social change, particularly in addressing global heating and ecosystem collapse. The interconnectedness of these issues is underscored by the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict, which could exacerbate nuclear tensions. The paper calls for integrating climate change considerations into national security strategies to address these intertwined challenges effectively.
Key findings
The existence of nuclear weapons and the failure to control them internationally continue to pose a significant threat to global security.
Evidence
The paper notes that despite efforts, the total number of nuclear warheads remains at 10,161 as of 2015, with the Doomsday Clock set at 100 seconds to midnight, reflecting the ongoing risk of nuclear conflict.
What it means
The persistent threat of nuclear weapons underscores the need for international cooperation and effective control measures to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes.
The initial optimism surrounding nuclear power and other technologies often gives way to disillusionment as their limitations and dangers become apparent.
Evidence
Historical examples include the promise of ''electricity too cheap to meter'' and the belief that technology would unify humanity, which were later contradicted by the realities of nuclear waste and the misuse of technology for propaganda.
What it means
This pattern of technological disillusionment highlights the importance of balancing technological advancements with social and ethical considerations.
The interconnectedness of nuclear threats and environmental challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach to global security.
Evidence
The paper emphasizes the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict to exacerbate nuclear tensions, calling for climate change to be integrated into national security strategies.
What it means
Addressing these interconnected threats requires a holistic approach that considers both technological and social dimensions to ensure a sustainable future.
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Sponsored links
Nuclear in Our Lives
Cite this brief: McGowan, Alan. 'Nuclear in Our Lives'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/nuclear-in-our-lives/
Brief created by: Professor Alan McGowan | Year brief made: 2025
Original research:
- McGowan, A., ‘Nuclear in Our Lives’ 64(1), pp. 33–37 https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329. – https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329
Research brief:
Investigates the interconnected existential threats posed by nuclear weapons, global heating, and biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need for collective action to ensure a sustainable future.
The paper highlights the historical and ongoing challenges of nuclear weapons, tracing back to the discovery of radiation in 1896 and the subsequent development of nuclear bombs, which culminated in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This period marked a significant transformation in science and politics, as the power of nuclear energy was realized. The Cold War era further complicated global politics, with the United States and the Soviet Union embroiled in an arms race, exacerbated by mistrust and the belief that nuclear deterrence was essential for national security. Despite the reduction of nuclear warheads from 24,876 in 1961 to 10,161 in 2015, the threat remains significant, with the Doomsday Clock now at 100 seconds to midnight, indicating the persistent danger of nuclear conflict.
The paper also discusses the broader implications of technological advancements, such as nuclear power and the internet, which were initially met with euphoria but later revealed dystopian potentials. The belief in technology as a savior often overshadows the need for social change, particularly in addressing global heating and ecosystem collapse. The interconnectedness of these issues is underscored by the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict, which could exacerbate nuclear tensions. The paper calls for integrating climate change considerations into national security strategies to address these intertwined challenges effectively.
Findings:
The existence of nuclear weapons and the failure to control them internationally continue to pose a significant threat to global security.
The paper notes that despite efforts, the total number of nuclear warheads remains at 10,161 as of 2015, with the Doomsday Clock set at 100 seconds to midnight, reflecting the ongoing risk of nuclear conflict.
The persistent threat of nuclear weapons underscores the need for international cooperation and effective control measures to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes.
The initial optimism surrounding nuclear power and other technologies often gives way to disillusionment as their limitations and dangers become apparent.
Historical examples include the promise of ”electricity too cheap to meter” and the belief that technology would unify humanity, which were later contradicted by the realities of nuclear waste and the misuse of technology for propaganda.
This pattern of technological disillusionment highlights the importance of balancing technological advancements with social and ethical considerations.
The interconnectedness of nuclear threats and environmental challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach to global security.
The paper emphasizes the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict to exacerbate nuclear tensions, calling for climate change to be integrated into national security strategies.
Addressing these interconnected threats requires a holistic approach that considers both technological and social dimensions to ensure a sustainable future.