Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2

Brief about:

Journal Article (2022)

Paywalled link
Other researchers:
Peerasit Kamnuansilpa, David Streckfuss
PrintShare
Cite page
Draper, John. 'Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/understanding-the-ethnic-inequality-of-the-thai-lao-through-perspectives-on-promoting-social-inclusion-policy-in-thailand-in-accordance-with-un-sustainable-development-goal-10-2/

 The research examines the differences between a primarily Bangkok Establishment sample and a middle class Thai Lao educator sample on the socioeconomic and political inclusion of the Thai Lao, who face unacknowledged structural inequalities. Furthermore, it prescribes policies to promote inclusion.

It has been previously found that there exist large horizontal structural inequalities between different ethnic groups in Thailand, i.e., exclusion along socioeconomic and political lines, and this research tries to understand why these exist, in areas such as  education outcomes, in the case of the Thai Lao.

The Thai Lao are the largest ethnic minority group in Thailand. However, the Thai Lao ethnic group are not recognised by the Thai state, which means their official inclusion is difficult.

As an example of social exclusion, the Thai Lao encounter daily racial prejudice due to their looks, accent, and culture, etc. Notably, Thai Lao women are regarded as the opposite of beautiful due to the Thai conceptualisation of  beauty.

As an illustration of economic exclusion, the Thai Lao score poorly on indices like household income.

To exemplify their political exclusion, Thailand is one of the last remaining countries in the world which has centrally appointed provincial governors, and only the Central Thai possess a democratic governance structure, for the capital of the Central Thai region, Bangkok.

This was a case study which, for the first time, sought to obtain an Establishment viewpoint on the inclusion/exclusion of the Thai Lao, Thailand’s largest, if unrecognized, ethnic minority, as well as a viewpoint from a Thai Lao educator sample. While the number of contributors was low, the case study is nonetheless interesting for the breadth and depth of material collected via its survey instrument as well as the categorization of material according to the concepts of social, economic, and political inclusion.

 

Key findings

  1. While this was not a quantitative study, 69.5% of the ‘Establishment’ sampled disagreed with the need/desirability of practices to promote the inclusion of the Thai-Lao ethnic group, with the common themes being that the Thai Lao do not exist or that the Thai Lao do exist but are not excluded.
  2. 60.8% of the ‘Local government education administrators’ sample agreed with the need/desirability of practices to promote inclusion, with the most common theme being the need for greater decentralization.

Proposed action

  1. The larger goal should be to attain democratically elected provincinal governors for each region who could guarantee more political inclusion of minority ethnic groups, the largest of which is the Thai Lao
  2. While UN agencies promoting inclusion such as the UNDP and UNESCO cannot openly support Thai political parties in favour of political decentralization, they should openly support the principle of establishing democratically elected provincial governors, as in most other postcolonial societies worldwide
  3. In order to reduce prejudice against the Thai Lao community, there needs to be active promotion of Thai Lao and Laos literature, culture, music and clothing, etc

    , in line with ASEAN’s Socioeconomic Pillar, to ensure greater social inclusion.

  4. Campaigns against racial prejudice against the Thai Lao (and other ethnic minorities) are also necessary
  5. Thailand’s military-civil government could better accept inclusion if they are convinced of its economic advantages
  6. The research is of interest for other medium high developed multi-ethnic societies promoting, or with the option of promoting, social, economic, and political inclusion along ethnic lines, in Southeast Asia and also globally

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to ASEAN

These insights were made available thanks to the support of ASEAN, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

ASEAN Logo

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2

Cite this brief: Draper, John. 'Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/understanding-the-ethnic-inequality-of-the-thai-lao-through-perspectives-on-promoting-social-inclusion-policy-in-thailand-in-accordance-with-un-sustainable-development-goal-10-2/

Brief created by: Dr John Draper | Year brief made: 2022

Original research:

  • P. K., Draper, J., & D. S., ‘Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2’ 28(2) (pp. 232–251) https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2021.2003191. – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504630.2021.2003191

Research brief:

The research examines the differences between a primarily Bangkok Establishment sample and a middle class Thai Lao educator sample on the socioeconomic and political inclusion of the Thai Lao, who face unacknowledged structural inequalities. Furthermore, it prescribes policies to promote inclusion.

It has been previously found that there exist large horizontal structural inequalities between different ethnic groups in Thailand, i.e., exclusion along socioeconomic and political lines, and this research tries to understand why these exist, in areas such as  education outcomes, in the case of the Thai Lao.

The Thai Lao are the largest ethnic minority group in Thailand. However, the Thai Lao ethnic group are not recognised by the Thai state, which means their official inclusion is difficult.

As an example of social exclusion, the Thai Lao encounter daily racial prejudice due to their looks, accent, and culture, etc. Notably, Thai Lao women are regarded as the opposite of beautiful due to the Thai conceptualisation of  beauty.

As an illustration of economic exclusion, the Thai Lao score poorly on indices like household income.

To exemplify their political exclusion, Thailand is one of the last remaining countries in the world which has centrally appointed provincial governors, and only the Central Thai possess a democratic governance structure, for the capital of the Central Thai region, Bangkok.

This was a case study which, for the first time, sought to obtain an Establishment viewpoint on the inclusion/exclusion of the Thai Lao, Thailand’s largest, if unrecognized, ethnic minority, as well as a viewpoint from a Thai Lao educator sample. While the number of contributors was low, the case study is nonetheless interesting for the breadth and depth of material collected via its survey instrument as well as the categorization of material according to the concepts of social, economic, and political inclusion.

Findings:

While this was not a quantitative study, 69.5% of the ‘Establishment’ sampled disagreed with the need/desirability of practices to promote the inclusion of the Thai-Lao ethnic group, with the common themes being that the Thai Lao do not exist or that the Thai Lao do exist but are not excluded.

60.8% of the ‘Local government education administrators’ sample agreed with the need/desirability of practices to promote inclusion, with the most common theme being the need for greater decentralization.

Advice:

The larger goal should be to attain democratically elected provincinal governors for each region who could guarantee more political inclusion of minority ethnic groups, the largest of which is the Thai Lao

While UN agencies promoting inclusion such as the UNDP and UNESCO cannot openly support Thai political parties in favour of political decentralization, they should openly support the principle of establishing democratically elected provincial governors, as in most other postcolonial societies worldwide

In order to reduce prejudice against the Thai Lao community, there needs to be active promotion of Thai Lao and Laos literature, culture, music and clothing, etc

    • , in line with ASEAN’s Socioeconomic Pillar, to ensure greater social inclusion.

Campaigns against racial prejudice against the Thai Lao (and other ethnic minorities) are also necessary

Thailand’s military-civil government could better accept inclusion if they are convinced of its economic advantages

The research is of interest for other medium high developed multi-ethnic societies promoting, or with the option of promoting, social, economic, and political inclusion along ethnic lines, in Southeast Asia and also globally

Peer Reviewed

"Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2"

Cite paper

P. K., Draper, J., & D. S., ‘Understanding the Ethnic Inequality of the Thai Lao through Perspectives on Promoting Social Inclusion Policy in Thailand in Accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goal 10.2’ 28(2) (pp. 232–251) https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2021.2003191.

2022 · Social Identities · pp. 232-251Find full paper →DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2021.2003191
Co-authors
Peerasit Kamnuansilpa, David Streckfuss
Methodology
This is a qualitative research.

The perspectives of the two sample groups were collected through a survey, with a thematic focus on the discourses and narratives around social, economic, and political inclusion.

Social inclusion is understood through a multi-level framework that is interconnected with, but separate from, economic inclusion and political inclusion. The survey comprised eleven questions, of which the first ten were ‘Yes/No’ questions and the last was open ended.

The surveys were sent to two groups. The first group can be described as the ‘Establishment’. The survey was sent to 394 senior decision makers from the bureaucracy, legislature, executive and political parties, with an 8.6% response rate.

The second group was  ‘Local Thai Lao Education Administrators’, and included 140 people working in municipal education departments. This group had a 27.9% response rate.

These were compared with a third sample consisting of ‘ordinary people’, described in a separate research article.

As this was a qualitative study, the research findings can not be deemed to represent the views of the wider community. They are merely indicative towards a need for further research.

Furthermore, the research was conducted under the 2014-2019 military regime, which may have sharpened the opinion of the ‘Establishment’ towards the ethnic policies in Thailand while subduing the Thai Lao perspective.

Funding

This research was independently conducted and did not receive funding from outside of the university.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more