Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index

Based on:

Journal Article (2020)

Open access

 The study assessed the social vulnerability levels of smallholder famers in Zambia.

Brief by:
Researcher / Policy Analyst
Research collaborators:
Xavier Takam Tiamgne
PrintShare
Cite page
Dumenu, William. 'Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/social-vulnerability-of-smallholder-farmers-to-climate-change-in-zambia-the-applicability-of-social-vulnerability-index/
Climate Action

The reason for targeting social vulnerability was that much of the work done around climate change vulnerability focuses on the biophysical aspects but not the underlying factors. The underlying factors are mostly things that relate to the social, economic and demographic factors of the people who are exposed to climate change effects. We looked at how these factors influence the level of vulnerability of such people.

In Zambia, the government was interested in appraising the climate change situation in the country and looking at its impact on various groups. However, unfortunately they did not pay attention to the social vulnerability aspect. We felt this was a big gap in trying to address the needs of the people.

The research also provides practitioners with a tool to help them to do a multi-dimensional assessment of the vulnerability levels of people who are faced with climate change.

A comparative analysis was carried out between two districts in Zambia: Chirundu and Masaiti.

 

Key findings

  • We were able to determine the vulnerability levels of these districts and show that the Chirundu district was most vulnerable.
  • We were also able to show some of the coping measures that the local people had already engaged with.

    There were two broad categories of coping measures: on-farm strategy and off-farm strategy. Their on-farm strategies consisted of planting different varieties of crops, particularly varieties that were drought tolerant, trying to plant crops at different times than they traditionally would, and varying their cropping or planting schedule.

  • These strategies were due to the delay in the onsets of rains.

    Their off-farm strategies consisted of engaging in off-farm jobs to supplement income, engaging the sales of non-farm assets and also receiving government assistance.

Proposed action

  • Environmental NGOs and development aid practitioners should come together to work on improving the socioeconomic situations of people, rather than working in isolation
  • Should adopt the use of the social vulnerability index in trying to understand the multiple factors that underline the community’s or people’s vulnerability to climate change
  • Pay attention to the underlying factors that influence people’s vulnerability to climate change, rather than always focusing on the biophysical aspects
  • Across many African countries, there is a need for adoption of conservation or climate-smart agricultural practices
  • The government should look at and improve the socioeconomic profiles of smallholder farmers

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to iDE Global

These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

iDE Global Logo
Special thanks to Jasmyn Spanswick for preparation assistance

We would like to extend a special thank you to Jasmyn Spanswick, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index

Cite this brief: Dumenu, William. 'Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/social-vulnerability-of-smallholder-farmers-to-climate-change-in-zambia-the-applicability-of-social-vulnerability-index/

Brief created by: Dr William Dumenu | Year brief made: 2022

Original research:

  • X. T. T., & Dumenu, W., ‘Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index’ 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2227-0. – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-020-2227-0

Research brief:

The study assessed the social vulnerability levels of smallholder famers in Zambia.

The reason for targeting social vulnerability was that much of the work done around climate change vulnerability focuses on the biophysical aspects but not the underlying factors. The underlying factors are mostly things that relate to the social, economic and demographic factors of the people who are exposed to climate change effects. We looked at how these factors influence the level of vulnerability of such people.

In Zambia, the government was interested in appraising the climate change situation in the country and looking at its impact on various groups. However, unfortunately they did not pay attention to the social vulnerability aspect. We felt this was a big gap in trying to address the needs of the people.

The research also provides practitioners with a tool to help them to do a multi-dimensional assessment of the vulnerability levels of people who are faced with climate change.

A comparative analysis was carried out between two districts in Zambia: Chirundu and Masaiti.

Findings:

We were able to determine the vulnerability levels of these districts and show that the Chirundu district was most vulnerable.

We were also able to show some of the coping measures that the local people had already engaged with.

There were two broad categories of coping measures: on-farm strategy and off-farm strategy. Their on-farm strategies consisted of planting different varieties of crops, particularly varieties that were drought tolerant, trying to plant crops at different times than they traditionally would, and varying their cropping or planting schedule.

These strategies were due to the delay in the onsets of rains.

Their off-farm strategies consisted of engaging in off-farm jobs to supplement income, engaging the sales of non-farm assets and also receiving government assistance.

Advice:

Environmental NGOs and development aid practitioners should come together to work on improving the socioeconomic situations of people, rather than working in isolation

    • You cannot disentangle climate change issues from improving socio-economic situations. This study would be useful to their activities.

Should adopt the use of the social vulnerability index in trying to understand the multiple factors that underline the community’s or people’s vulnerability to climate change

Pay attention to the underlying factors that influence people’s vulnerability to climate change, rather than always focusing on the biophysical aspects

Across many African countries, there is a need for adoption of conservation or climate-smart agricultural practices

    • Moving away from traditional farming to climate-smart agricultural practices is very important because they also provide resilience of the system to climate change. These practices should be well publicised, disseminated and adopted within Sub-Saharan Africa.

The government should look at and improve the socioeconomic profiles of smallholder farmers

    • Much of the agricultural production rests of the shoulders of smallholder farmers, as they are the greatest share. The socioeconomic profiles of smallholder farmers can be improved by introducing them to non-farm income and economic activities.
14100
|
2020

"Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index"

Cite paper

X. T. T., & Dumenu, W., ‘Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: the applicability of social vulnerability index’ 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2227-0.

Published in SN Applied Sciences.
Peer Reviewed

DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2227-0
🔗 Find full paper (Open access)
Methodology
This is a mixed methods research.
comparative case study focus groups interviews

The study was conducted in two districts: Chirundu and Masaiti.

These areas were selected for the study because of their contrasting climatic features (semi-arid/humid-wet) and livelihood characteristics. Data was collected from 194 respondents in 9 agricultural camps located in 9 wards. 100 respondents were selected in the Masaiti district, and 94 in Chirundu.

In selecting the respondents, a two-stage sampling method was used.

The first stage involved random sampling, whereas the second stage involved purposive sampling. The purposive sampling was to ensure that respondents aged 35 years and above who have experienced long-term changes in the climate including its impacts were captured for interview.

Questionnaires, interviews and focus group discussions were used in collecting data for the assessment of social vulnerability and coping strategies. Qualitative and quantitative analytical methods were applied in the analysis of the data.

However, it's important to note that the selection of vulnerability indicators used should, where possible, be done in a participatory manner. However, in this study no participatory approach was used. Instead, we reviewed the literature and other studies within Zambia to look at what they had done and then used it do this study. If you are really interested in addressing the issues of the people, you should go down to the local level, talk to people, understand them, and come together to generate the indicators.



Funding

This research was funded by an external organisation, but detail has not been provided.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more