Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

  • Climate Action
  • Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  • For policymakers
  • Brief created: 2025
  • Sign up

Nuclear in Our Lives

Brief about:

Journal Article (2022)

Paywalled link
Written by:
Assistant Professor (part time) | The New School
PrintShare
Cite page
McGowan, Alan. 'Nuclear in Our Lives'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/nuclear-in-our-lives/

 Investigates the interconnected existential threats posed by nuclear weapons, global heating, and biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need for collective action to ensure a sustainable future.

The paper highlights the historical and ongoing challenges of nuclear weapons, tracing back to the discovery of radiation in 1896 and the subsequent development of nuclear bombs, which culminated in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This period marked a significant transformation in science and politics, as the power of nuclear energy was realized. The Cold War era further complicated global politics, with the United States and the Soviet Union embroiled in an arms race, exacerbated by mistrust and the belief that nuclear deterrence was essential for national security. Despite the reduction of nuclear warheads from 24,876 in 1961 to 10,161 in 2015, the threat remains significant, with the Doomsday Clock now at 100 seconds to midnight, indicating the persistent danger of nuclear conflict.

The paper also discusses the broader implications of technological advancements, such as nuclear power and the internet, which were initially met with euphoria but later revealed dystopian potentials. The belief in technology as a savior often overshadows the need for social change, particularly in addressing global heating and ecosystem collapse. The interconnectedness of these issues is underscored by the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict, which could exacerbate nuclear tensions. The paper calls for integrating climate change considerations into national security strategies to address these intertwined challenges effectively.

 

Key findings

  1. The existence of nuclear weapons and the failure to control them internationally continue to pose a significant threat to global security.
    Evidence

    The paper notes that despite efforts, the total number of nuclear warheads remains at 10,161 as of 2015, with the Doomsday Clock set at 100 seconds to midnight, reflecting the ongoing risk of nuclear conflict.

    What it means

    The persistent threat of nuclear weapons underscores the need for international cooperation and effective control measures to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes.

  2. The initial optimism surrounding nuclear power and other technologies often gives way to disillusionment as their limitations and dangers become apparent.
    Evidence

    Historical examples include the promise of ''electricity too cheap to meter'' and the belief that technology would unify humanity, which were later contradicted by the realities of nuclear waste and the misuse of technology for propaganda.

    What it means

    This pattern of technological disillusionment highlights the importance of balancing technological advancements with social and ethical considerations.

  3. The interconnectedness of nuclear threats and environmental challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach to global security.
    Evidence

    The paper emphasizes the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict to exacerbate nuclear tensions, calling for climate change to be integrated into national security strategies.

    What it means

    Addressing these interconnected threats requires a holistic approach that considers both technological and social dimensions to ensure a sustainable future.

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Nuclear in Our Lives

Cite this brief: McGowan, Alan. 'Nuclear in Our Lives'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/nuclear-in-our-lives/

Brief created by: Professor Alan McGowan | Year brief made: 2025

Original research:

  • McGowan, A., ‘Nuclear in Our Lives’ 64(1), pp. 33–37 https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329. – https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329

Research brief:

Investigates the interconnected existential threats posed by nuclear weapons, global heating, and biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need for collective action to ensure a sustainable future.

The paper highlights the historical and ongoing challenges of nuclear weapons, tracing back to the discovery of radiation in 1896 and the subsequent development of nuclear bombs, which culminated in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This period marked a significant transformation in science and politics, as the power of nuclear energy was realized. The Cold War era further complicated global politics, with the United States and the Soviet Union embroiled in an arms race, exacerbated by mistrust and the belief that nuclear deterrence was essential for national security. Despite the reduction of nuclear warheads from 24,876 in 1961 to 10,161 in 2015, the threat remains significant, with the Doomsday Clock now at 100 seconds to midnight, indicating the persistent danger of nuclear conflict.

The paper also discusses the broader implications of technological advancements, such as nuclear power and the internet, which were initially met with euphoria but later revealed dystopian potentials. The belief in technology as a savior often overshadows the need for social change, particularly in addressing global heating and ecosystem collapse. The interconnectedness of these issues is underscored by the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict, which could exacerbate nuclear tensions. The paper calls for integrating climate change considerations into national security strategies to address these intertwined challenges effectively.

Findings:

The existence of nuclear weapons and the failure to control them internationally continue to pose a significant threat to global security.

The paper notes that despite efforts, the total number of nuclear warheads remains at 10,161 as of 2015, with the Doomsday Clock set at 100 seconds to midnight, reflecting the ongoing risk of nuclear conflict.

The persistent threat of nuclear weapons underscores the need for international cooperation and effective control measures to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes.

The initial optimism surrounding nuclear power and other technologies often gives way to disillusionment as their limitations and dangers become apparent.

Historical examples include the promise of ”electricity too cheap to meter” and the belief that technology would unify humanity, which were later contradicted by the realities of nuclear waste and the misuse of technology for propaganda.

This pattern of technological disillusionment highlights the importance of balancing technological advancements with social and ethical considerations.

The interconnectedness of nuclear threats and environmental challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach to global security.

The paper emphasizes the potential for climate-induced migration and conflict to exacerbate nuclear tensions, calling for climate change to be integrated into national security strategies.

Addressing these interconnected threats requires a holistic approach that considers both technological and social dimensions to ensure a sustainable future.

Peer Reviewed

"Nuclear in Our Lives"

Cite paper

McGowan, A., ‘Nuclear in Our Lives’ 64(1), pp. 33–37 https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329.

2022 · Environment: Science And Policy For Sustainable Development · pp. 33-37Find full paper →DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2022.1997329
Methodology
This is a theoretical discussion.

This commentary synthesizes historical and contemporary perspectives on nuclear weapons and environmental challenges, drawing on a range of sources to highlight the interconnectedness of these existential threats. It does not involve empirical data collection but provides a critical analysis of existing literature and historical events.

Funding

This research was independently conducted and did not receive funding from outside of the university.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more