Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

  • Gender Equality
  • Life Below Water
  • Reduced Inequality
  • Academia
  • South Africa
  • Brief created: 2025
  • Sign up

Hydrofeminist thinking with oceans: political and scholarly possibilities

Brief about:

Journal Article (2025)

Paywalled link
PrintShare
Cite page
Muharram, Mohammed. 'Hydrofeminist thinking with oceans: political and scholarly possibilities'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/hydrofeminist-thinking-with-oceans-political-and-scholarly-possibilities/

 Explores the intersection of feminist theory, environmental humanities, and postcolonial thought through the lens of hydrofeminism, specifically within the socio-political and geographical context of South Africa.

South Africa’s unique geographical and socio-political landscape serves as a backdrop for examining the intersection of feminist theory, environmental humanities, and postcolonial thought. The volume ”Hydrofeminist Thinking with Oceans” is edited by Tamara Shefer, Vivienne Bozalek, and Nike Romano, who are experts in feminist new materialisms, posthumanism, intersectional gender justice, and artistic research. The editors aim to create alternative knowledges towards justice and planetary flourishing by engaging with oceanic and political scholarship. The book opens with a foreword by Astrida Neimanis, a leading figure in feminist Blue Humanities, who introduces the concept of hydrofeminism. Neimanis emphasizes a reciprocal relationship with water, urging a shared responsibility for a more just and connected world. Her question, ”What can water teach us?” is central to the volume’s exploration of social and environmental justice.

The volume is structured around essays that delve into hydrofeminist scholarship and activism in South Africa, highlighting the interconnectedness of oceanic justice, Indigenous knowledge, and multispecies relations. The interdisciplinary approach blends theory and action, using decolonial and feminist perspectives to challenge dominant oceanic narratives. The essays cover a range of topics, including ancestral knowledge in ocean decision-making, pedagogies of care for shared water resources, surfing as activism, and the emotional significance of sea beans in museum archives. The volume also addresses colonial hauntings in Cape Town’s waters and the wisdom of Xhosa ocean elders. The use of the term ”womxn” in Chapter 9 emphasizes intersectionality and aligns with Black feminist and hydrofeminist perspectives. The volume is praised for its contribution to the Blue Humanities and Global South Studies, offering a justice-oriented perspective on the ocean’s role in reshaping understanding of space, identity, and activism.

 

Key findings

  1. Hydrofeminism provides a framework for exploring oceanic justice and environmental humanities through feminist and postcolonial lenses.
    Evidence

    The volume includes essays that utilize feminist new materialism, posthumanism, and Indigenous knowledge to challenge dominant oceanic narratives. Chapter 1 introduces hydrofeminism as both a scholarly and activist framework, while Chapter 2 explores ancestral knowledge in ocean decision-making. Chapter 3 highlights pedagogies of care for shared water resources, and Chapter 4 examines surfing as a space for activism and transformation.

    What it means

    The interdisciplinary approach of hydrofeminism offers new perspectives on oceanic justice, emphasizing the interconnectedness of social and environmental issues and the importance of diverse methodologies in rethinking ocean studies.

  2. The volume emphasizes the importance of Indigenous knowledge and multispecies relations in understanding oceanic justice.
    Evidence

    Chapter 12 amplifies the wisdom of Xhosa ocean elders and their insights on oceanic traditions. Chapter 5 rethinks more-than-human aesthetics through an octopus-inspired pedagogy, while Chapter 8 links ancient oceanic histories to contemporary ecological concerns.

    What it means

    By incorporating Indigenous knowledge and multispecies relations, the volume highlights the need for inclusive and diverse perspectives in addressing oceanic justice and environmental challenges.

  3. The use of the term ''womxn'' in Chapter 9 underscores the volume's commitment to intersectionality and social justice.
    Evidence

    The term ''womxn'' is used deliberately to emphasize intersectionality and highlight the specific struggles of women of color in academia. This linguistic choice aligns with Black feminist and hydrofeminist perspectives, as noted in the chapter's broader engagement with social justice and identity politics.

    What it means

    The use of ''womxn'' reflects the volume's focus on inclusivity and the recognition of diverse experiences, particularly those marginalized by race, gender identity, or non-binary identities.

  4. The volume contributes to the Blue Humanities by expanding its geographical and epistemological scope.
    Evidence

    By focusing on the South African context, the volume brings in perspectives that have often been marginalized in global discourses. Steve Mentz, the founder of the Blue Humanities, praises the volume for advancing oceanic eco-theories through ''innovative practices'' and visions ''for social and environmental justice.''

    What it means

    The volume's focus on South Africa enriches the Blue Humanities by incorporating underrepresented perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of oceanic justice and environmental issues.

  5. The volume's interdisciplinary approach offers valuable insights for scholars and students across various fields.
    Evidence

    The volume is praised by Isabel Hofmeyr for its dynamic engagement with contemporary hydrofeminist theories, refracted through a Global South and feminist lens. It is considered invaluable for scholars and students of social and cultural geography, environmental humanities, blue humanities, feminist theory, and Global South studies.

    What it means

    The interdisciplinary nature of the volume provides a justice-oriented perspective on the ocean's role in reshaping understanding of space, identity, and activism, making it a significant resource for academic and activist communities.

Proposed action

  1. We need to stop treating the ocean as just a resource and start seeing it as a partner in justice. This means listening to local and Indigenous knowledge, including women’s voices, and using care—not control—as our guide in environmental action

    Include coastal and Indigenous women in ocean decision-making—formally recognizing their knowledge, lived experience, and leadership in shaping policies around climate, conservation, and coastal development

    Create safe and inclusive spaces—like community councils, workshops, and listening sessions—where Indigenous and coastal women are invited not just to speak, but to lead. Make sure their knowledge is respected as equal to scientific expertise, and support their involvement with fair pay, translation, and long-term partnerships

Helpful resources

  • ArticleHydrofeminism: Or, On Becoming a Body of Water
    asks us to rethink who we are by thinking with water.
    Visit resource ↗

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Hydrofeminist thinking with oceans: political and scholarly possibilities

Cite this brief: Muharram, Mohammed. 'Hydrofeminist thinking with oceans: political and scholarly possibilities'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/hydrofeminist-thinking-with-oceans-political-and-scholarly-possibilities/

Brief created by: Dr Mohammed Muharram | Year brief made: 2025

Original research:

  • Muharram, M., (2025) ‘review of Hydrofeminist Thinking With Oceans Political and Scholarly Possibilities’ Social & Cultural Geography 1(1), pp. 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2025.2482301. – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14649365.2025.2482301

Research brief:

Explores the intersection of feminist theory, environmental humanities, and postcolonial thought through the lens of hydrofeminism, specifically within the socio-political and geographical context of South Africa.

South Africa’s unique geographical and socio-political landscape serves as a backdrop for examining the intersection of feminist theory, environmental humanities, and postcolonial thought. The volume ”Hydrofeminist Thinking with Oceans” is edited by Tamara Shefer, Vivienne Bozalek, and Nike Romano, who are experts in feminist new materialisms, posthumanism, intersectional gender justice, and artistic research. The editors aim to create alternative knowledges towards justice and planetary flourishing by engaging with oceanic and political scholarship. The book opens with a foreword by Astrida Neimanis, a leading figure in feminist Blue Humanities, who introduces the concept of hydrofeminism. Neimanis emphasizes a reciprocal relationship with water, urging a shared responsibility for a more just and connected world. Her question, ”What can water teach us?” is central to the volume’s exploration of social and environmental justice.

The volume is structured around essays that delve into hydrofeminist scholarship and activism in South Africa, highlighting the interconnectedness of oceanic justice, Indigenous knowledge, and multispecies relations. The interdisciplinary approach blends theory and action, using decolonial and feminist perspectives to challenge dominant oceanic narratives. The essays cover a range of topics, including ancestral knowledge in ocean decision-making, pedagogies of care for shared water resources, surfing as activism, and the emotional significance of sea beans in museum archives. The volume also addresses colonial hauntings in Cape Town’s waters and the wisdom of Xhosa ocean elders. The use of the term ”womxn” in Chapter 9 emphasizes intersectionality and aligns with Black feminist and hydrofeminist perspectives. The volume is praised for its contribution to the Blue Humanities and Global South Studies, offering a justice-oriented perspective on the ocean’s role in reshaping understanding of space, identity, and activism.

Findings:

Hydrofeminism provides a framework for exploring oceanic justice and environmental humanities through feminist and postcolonial lenses.

The volume includes essays that utilize feminist new materialism, posthumanism, and Indigenous knowledge to challenge dominant oceanic narratives. Chapter 1 introduces hydrofeminism as both a scholarly and activist framework, while Chapter 2 explores ancestral knowledge in ocean decision-making. Chapter 3 highlights pedagogies of care for shared water resources, and Chapter 4 examines surfing as a space for activism and transformation.

The interdisciplinary approach of hydrofeminism offers new perspectives on oceanic justice, emphasizing the interconnectedness of social and environmental issues and the importance of diverse methodologies in rethinking ocean studies.

The volume emphasizes the importance of Indigenous knowledge and multispecies relations in understanding oceanic justice.

Chapter 12 amplifies the wisdom of Xhosa ocean elders and their insights on oceanic traditions. Chapter 5 rethinks more-than-human aesthetics through an octopus-inspired pedagogy, while Chapter 8 links ancient oceanic histories to contemporary ecological concerns.

By incorporating Indigenous knowledge and multispecies relations, the volume highlights the need for inclusive and diverse perspectives in addressing oceanic justice and environmental challenges.

The use of the term ”womxn” in Chapter 9 underscores the volume’s commitment to intersectionality and social justice.

The term ”womxn” is used deliberately to emphasize intersectionality and highlight the specific struggles of women of color in academia. This linguistic choice aligns with Black feminist and hydrofeminist perspectives, as noted in the chapter’s broader engagement with social justice and identity politics.

The use of ”womxn” reflects the volume’s focus on inclusivity and the recognition of diverse experiences, particularly those marginalized by race, gender identity, or non-binary identities.

The volume contributes to the Blue Humanities by expanding its geographical and epistemological scope.

By focusing on the South African context, the volume brings in perspectives that have often been marginalized in global discourses. Steve Mentz, the founder of the Blue Humanities, praises the volume for advancing oceanic eco-theories through ”innovative practices” and visions ”for social and environmental justice.”

The volume’s focus on South Africa enriches the Blue Humanities by incorporating underrepresented perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of oceanic justice and environmental issues.

The volume’s interdisciplinary approach offers valuable insights for scholars and students across various fields.

The volume is praised by Isabel Hofmeyr for its dynamic engagement with contemporary hydrofeminist theories, refracted through a Global South and feminist lens. It is considered invaluable for scholars and students of social and cultural geography, environmental humanities, blue humanities, feminist theory, and Global South studies.

The interdisciplinary nature of the volume provides a justice-oriented perspective on the ocean’s role in reshaping understanding of space, identity, and activism, making it a significant resource for academic and activist communities.

Advice:

We need to stop treating the ocean as just a resource and start seeing it as a partner in justice. This means listening to local and Indigenous knowledge, including women’s voices, and using care—not control—as our guide in environmental action

    • Create safe and inclusive spaces—like community councils, workshops, and listening sessions—where Indigenous and coastal women are invited not just to speak, but to lead. Make sure their knowledge is respected as equal to scientific expertise, and support their involvement with fair pay, translation, and long-term partnerships
Peer Reviewed

"review of Hydrofeminist Thinking With Oceans Political and Scholarly Possibilities"

Cite paper

Muharram, M., (2025) ‘review of Hydrofeminist Thinking With Oceans Political and Scholarly Possibilities’ Social & Cultural Geography 1(1), pp. 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2025.2482301.

2025 · Geography Compass · pp. 1-2Find full paper →DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2025.2482301
Methodology
This is a theoretical discussion.

This essay argues that our bodies are not separate from the world—we are watery beings, always connected to oceans, rivers, rain, and each other. Neimanis calls this way of thinking hydrofeminism: a feminist, embodied, and ecological perspective that sees water not just as a resource, but as a relation—something we are part of, something we owe care to. Instead of seeing the human body as closed and separate, Neimanis invites us to see it as porous, fluid, and deeply entangled with the world. She uses water as both a metaphor and a material force to challenge rigid ideas of identity, boundaries, and individualism.

Funding

This research was independently conducted and did not receive funding from outside of the university.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more