Content
About this brief
Affordable and Renewable Energy
No Poverty
Zero Hunger- Academia
- Brief created: 2025
- Sign up
Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?
Brief about:
Chapter in an Edited Book (2025)
Written by:
.jpg)
Other researchers:
Food Security vs Right to Water and Right to Food: where are the problems? show where academia can play its fact-finding and advisory role for rule-makers and other opinion leaders the time has come for academia to call a spade a spade five ways forward, still short of calling for a new multilateral trade regime!
Reform food value chain failures
Key findings
- Do no harm - and they will live.Evidence
Case Studies on policy failures in cooperative coffee farming.
What it meansAn old probnlem still unaddressed
Proposed action
- How Far do We Have to Go? This is the real question! The time has come for academia to call a spade a spade, letting governments reassemble at the level of commitments required by present circumstances and challenges to humankind. No use speculating whether the glass of WTO rules is half full or half empty. Governments must acknowledge that the present rules are a part of the problem. International governance is the first victim of the refusal to initiate negotiations on fundamental problems. Today, most governments neglect even the most burning issues, such as standard harmonisation or mutual recognition agreements for ‘like’ products and processing methods. This book chapter shows five new ways forward to avoid ‘green subsidy’ rows, whereby every state subsidising and promoting the decarbonisation agenda is accused of distorting trade.Step one
Rethinking Multilateralism versus Regional Trade Liberalisation
New trade agreements with high ambitions and low market access improvements need more trade security.
Step twoMore Labour Protection under Trade Law
Better use of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement
Step threeEnvironment and Climate: Justifying ‘Good’ Protectionism
Accompany the new EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) with mutual recognition of equivalent carbon taxation.
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?
Cite this brief: Häberli, Christian. 'Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/forever-searching/
Brief created by: Dr Christian Häberli | Year brief made: 2025
Original research:
- C. R. H. M. P. F. M. A. W. J. D. P. V. D. B. J. J. N. P. C. M. G. M. M. G. C. H. C. K. M. O. E. L. M. H. A. S. K. P. D. S. J. D. I. M. R. Z. A. I. B. M. F. E. U. P. A. A. G. H. A. R. E., & Häberli, C., Forever Searching: How Far Can We Go? In International Economic Law as Symphony: Thomas Cottier and the Harmonies of Trade, (pp. 111–122) https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509980758.ch-008. – https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph-detail?docid=b-9781509980758&pdfid=9781509980758.ch-008.pdf&tocid=b-9781509980758-chapter8
Research brief:
Food Security vs Right to Water and Right to Food: where are the problems? Forever Searching: How Far can We Go? (2025) Chapter 8 in Krista Nadakavukaren Schefer, Rodrigo Polanco & Pierre Sauvé (Eds.) International Economic Law as Symphony: Thomas Cottier and the Harmonies of Trade. Hart Publishing (London, UK), at https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b-9781509980758 show where academia…
Reform food value chain failures
Findings:
Do no harm – and they will live.
Case Studies on policy failures in cooperative coffee farming.
An old probnlem still unaddressed
Advice:
How Far do We Have to Go? This is the real question! The time has come for academia to call a spade a spade, letting governments reassemble at the level of commitments required by present circumstances and challenges to humankind. No use speculating whether the glass of WTO rules is half full or half empty. Governments must acknowledge that the present rules are a part of the problem. International governance is the first victim of the refusal to initiate negotiations on fundamental problems. Today, most governments neglect even the most burning issues, such as standard harmonisation or mutual recognition agreements for ‘like’ products and processing methods. This book chapter shows five new ways forward to avoid ‘green subsidy’ rows, whereby every state subsidising and promoting the decarbonisation agenda is accused of distorting trade.
- New trade agreements with high ambitions and low market access improvements need more trade security.
- Better use of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement
- Accompany the new EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) with mutual recognition of equivalent carbon taxation.








