Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

  • Affordable and Renewable Energy
  • No Poverty
  • Zero Hunger
  • Academia
  • Brief created: 2025
  • Sign up

Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?

Brief about:

Chapter in an Edited Book (2025)

Open access
Other researchers:
contributors: Rob Howse, Marion Panizzon, Frederick M. Abbott, William J. Davey, Peter Van den Bossche, James J. Nedumpara, Petros C. Mavroidis, Gabrielle Marceau, Maria George, Christian Häberli, Christine Kaufmann, Matthias Oesch, Elisa L., Michael Hahn, Ana Sijakovic Kressner, Panos Delimatsis🟥, Sufian Jusoh, Dr. Intan Murnira Ramli, Zaker Ahmad, Iryna Bogdanova, Malebakeng Forere, Ernst Ulrich Petersmann, Arthur Appleton, Gary Horlick, and Roberto Echandi.
PrintShare
Cite page
Häberli, Christian. 'Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/forever-searching/

 Food Security vs Right to Water and Right to Food: where are the problems? show where academia can play its fact-finding and advisory role for rule-makers and other opinion leaders the time has come for academia to call a spade a spade five ways forward, still short of calling for a new multilateral trade regime!

Reform food value chain failures

 

Key findings

  1. Do no harm - and they will live.
    Evidence

    Case Studies on policy failures in cooperative coffee farming.

    What it means

    An old probnlem still unaddressed

Proposed action

  1. How Far do We Have to Go? This is the real question! The time has come for academia to call a spade a spade, letting governments reassemble at the level of commitments required by present circumstances and challenges to humankind. No use speculating whether the glass of WTO rules is half full or half empty. Governments must acknowledge that the present rules are a part of the problem. International governance is the first victim of the refusal to initiate negotiations on fundamental problems. Today, most governments neglect even the most burning issues, such as standard harmonisation or mutual recognition agreements for ‘like’ products and processing methods. This book chapter shows five new ways forward to avoid ‘green subsidy’ rows, whereby every state subsidising and promoting the decarbonisation agenda is accused of distorting trade.
    Step one

    Rethinking Multilateralism versus Regional Trade Liberalisation

    New trade agreements with high ambitions and low market access improvements need more trade security.

    Step two

    More Labour Protection under Trade Law

    Better use of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement

    Step three

    Environment and Climate: Justifying ‘Good’ Protectionism

    Accompany the new EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) with mutual recognition of equivalent carbon taxation.

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?

Cite this brief: Häberli, Christian. 'Forever searching in a mess: How far do we have to go for more trade security?'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/forever-searching/

Brief created by: Dr Christian Häberli | Year brief made: 2025

Original research:

  • C. R. H. M. P. F. M. A. W. J. D. P. V. D. B. J. J. N. P. C. M. G. M. M. G. C. H. C. K. M. O. E. L. M. H. A. S. K. P. D. S. J. D. I. M. R. Z. A. I. B. M. F. E. U. P. A. A. G. H. A. R. E., & Häberli, C., Forever Searching: How Far Can We Go? In International Economic Law as Symphony: Thomas Cottier and the Harmonies of Trade, (pp. 111–122) https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509980758.ch-008. – https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph-detail?docid=b-9781509980758&pdfid=9781509980758.ch-008.pdf&tocid=b-9781509980758-chapter8

Research brief:

Food Security vs Right to Water and Right to Food: where are the problems? Forever Searching: How Far can We Go? (2025) Chapter 8 in Krista Nadakavukaren Schefer, Rodrigo Polanco & Pierre Sauvé (Eds.) International Economic Law as Symphony: Thomas Cottier and the Harmonies of Trade. Hart Publishing (London, UK), at https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b-9781509980758 show where academia…

Reform food value chain failures

Findings:

Do no harm – and they will live.

Case Studies on policy failures in cooperative coffee farming.

An old probnlem still unaddressed

Advice:

How Far do We Have to Go? This is the real question! The time has come for academia to call a spade a spade, letting governments reassemble at the level of commitments required by present circumstances and challenges to humankind. No use speculating whether the glass of WTO rules is half full or half empty. Governments must acknowledge that the present rules are a part of the problem. International governance is the first victim of the refusal to initiate negotiations on fundamental problems. Today, most governments neglect even the most burning issues, such as standard harmonisation or mutual recognition agreements for ‘like’ products and processing methods. This book chapter shows five new ways forward to avoid ‘green subsidy’ rows, whereby every state subsidising and promoting the decarbonisation agenda is accused of distorting trade.

    • New trade agreements with high ambitions and low market access improvements need more trade security.
    • Better use of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement
    • Accompany the new EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) with mutual recognition of equivalent carbon taxation.
Open Access|Peer Reviewed

"Forever Searching: How Far Can We Go?"

DownloadCite paper

C. R. H. M. P. F. M. A. W. J. D. P. V. D. B. J. J. N. P. C. M. G. M. M. G. C. H. C. K. M. O. E. L. M. H. A. S. K. P. D. S. J. D. I. M. R. Z. A. I. B. M. F. E. U. P. A. A. G. H. A. R. E., & Häberli, C., Forever Searching: How Far Can We Go? In International Economic Law as Symphony: Thomas Cottier and the Harmonies of Trade, (pp. 111–122) https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509980758.ch-008.

Chapter in an Edited Book · Bloomsbury PublishingFind full paper →DOI: 10.5040/9781509980758.ch-008
Methodology
This is a opinion paper.

Multilateralism remains the voie royale of trade and investment liberalisation. However, with the wisdom of hindsight, one might surmise that a more progressive view of comprehensive liberalisation, in particular in North–South agreements, would have avoided today’s visceral disputes on the adequacy of ‘trade only’ agreements.

Funding

This research was independently conducted and did not receive funding from outside of the university.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more