Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives

Brief about:

Journal Article (2021)

Open access
Written by:
Doctoral Researcher / Research Assistant | Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
Other researchers:
Mariola Acosta, Juliana Muriel, Jean-Francois Le Coq
PrintShare
Cite page
Howland, Fanny. 'Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/examining-the-barriers-to-gender-integration-in-agriculture-climate-change-food-security-and-nutrition-policies-guatemalan-and-honduran-perspectives/

 This research is about understanding the gender gaps and possible solutions in agriculture, climate change, food security and nutrition policies that can exist in Guatemala and Honduras, through narrative and policy document analysis.   

Our study examined the barriers leading to poor gender mainstreaming and potential solutions in policies applying to gender, agriculture, climate change, food security and nutrition, in both Guatemala and Honduras. Indeed, to include gender in policy is key to achieve national development goals and global challenges such as climate change and food and nutrition insecurity in the agriculture sector.

 

Key findings

  1. One of the key findings of this research is that a gap exists between policy elaboration and policy implementation.
    What it means

    We identified that in Guatemala and Honduras, there are many gender policies that have been elaborated. In some cases, it was a very participatory process, where not only government personnel were participating in the elaboration of the policy, but also NGOs, international cooperation organisations and researchers. However, at the end there is no budget and no project or program to implement this policy. We understood that it is not enough to have policy documents, you must look at policy implementation to understand the gap that exists.

  2. International corporations have a key role, because in many cases they are the ones who are pushing the government to elaborate gender policy to create gender units within the different ministries.
    What it means

    Sometimes they are also key to funding the elaboration of the policy. However, they only focus on the elaboration of documents, and they are not pushing beyond the creation of the policy.

  3. International cooperation have a key role and power to influence the governments.
    What it means

    They should go beyond the technical issue of not having gender policy and should instead be much more ambitious in terms of bridging this gender gap in these countries.

  4. Another finding was that there was a very pessimistic view from those working in gender towards the situation and the future in terms of bridging gender gaps.
    What it means

    They were very negative in terms of seeing a solution, at least in the short-term. It is important to note that they did not see an easy solution to these gender issues.

Proposed action

  1. For organisations working to close the gender gap in policy, it is important to have several strategies within the program

    They should not only work with government, but should try to work with, strengthen and empower civil society. We found it is very difficult to establish change within the government, as they are opposed to gender equality and gender mainstreaming and their interests are very far away from these goals. It is very difficult to initiate change in government, so as well as attempting to work with them, advocating laws, financing and strengthening gender units and programs led by the government, it is also important to seek other real roles pushing for change in this matter. Need to focus on how we can make civil society stronger and gain more knowledge, information, and data so that we can use these to implement change related to gender.

  2. We observed that it is not enough to say that your program is gender-friendly or gender-sensitive and that you are monitoring the number of women that participate in your workshop

    In the design of this program, the indicator and the objective should be beyond only participation of women. The indicator and the objective should look at empowerment and active participation. They should be more ambitious and have intangible objectives to effectively bridge the gap.

  3. It is important to continue to conduct research on gender and gender gap in order to carry out evidence-based advocacy
  4. The pandemic caused by Covid-19 has been a factor that has increased the vulnerability of the already vulnerable, such as women

    Therefore, it is recommended to take advantage of this global situation to keep the gender issue in the framework of the post-Covid-19 recovery agenda.

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to iDE Global

These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

iDE Global Logo
Special thanks to Jasmyn Spanswick for preparation assistance

We would like to extend a special thank you to Jasmyn Spanswick, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives

Cite this brief: Howland, Fanny. 'Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/examining-the-barriers-to-gender-integration-in-agriculture-climate-change-food-security-and-nutrition-policies-guatemalan-and-honduran-perspectives/

Brief created by: Fanny Howland | Year brief made: 2022

Original research:

  • M. A., Howland, F., & et al., ‘Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives’ 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.664253. – https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.664253/full

Research brief:

This research is about understanding the gender gaps and possible solutions in agriculture, climate change, food security and nutrition policies that can exist in Guatemala and Honduras, through narrative and policy document analysis.   

Our study examined the barriers leading to poor gender mainstreaming and potential solutions in policies applying to gender, agriculture, climate change, food security and nutrition, in both Guatemala and Honduras. Indeed, to include gender in policy is key to achieve national development goals and global challenges such as climate change and food and nutrition insecurity in the agriculture sector.

Findings:

One of the key findings of this research is that a gap exists between policy elaboration and policy implementation.

We identified that in Guatemala and Honduras, there are many gender policies that have been elaborated. In some cases, it was a very participatory process, where not only government personnel were participating in the elaboration of the policy, but also NGOs, international cooperation organisations and researchers. However, at the end there is no budget and no project or program to implement this policy. We understood that it is not enough to have policy documents, you must look at policy implementation to understand the gap that exists.

International corporations have a key role, because in many cases they are the ones who are pushing the government to elaborate gender policy to create gender units within the different ministries.

Sometimes they are also key to funding the elaboration of the policy. However, they only focus on the elaboration of documents, and they are not pushing beyond the creation of the policy.

International cooperation have a key role and power to influence the governments.

They should go beyond the technical issue of not having gender policy and should instead be much more ambitious in terms of bridging this gender gap in these countries.

Another finding was that there was a very pessimistic view from those working in gender towards the situation and the future in terms of bridging gender gaps.

They were very negative in terms of seeing a solution, at least in the short-term. It is important to note that they did not see an easy solution to these gender issues.

Advice:

For organisations working to close the gender gap in policy, it is important to have several strategies within the program

    • They should not only work with government, but should try to work with, strengthen and empower civil society. We found it is very difficult to establish change within the government, as they are opposed to gender equality and gender mainstreaming and their interests are very far away from these goals. It is very difficult to initiate change in government, so as well as attempting to work with them, advocating laws, financing and strengthening gender units and programs led by the government, it is also important to seek other real roles pushing for change in this matter. Need to focus on how we can make civil society stronger and gain more knowledge, information, and data so that we can use these to implement change related to gender.

We observed that it is not enough to say that your program is gender-friendly or gender-sensitive and that you are monitoring the number of women that participate in your workshop

    • In the design of this program, the indicator and the objective should be beyond only participation of women. The indicator and the objective should look at empowerment and active participation. They should be more ambitious and have intangible objectives to effectively bridge the gap.

It is important to continue to conduct research on gender and gender gap in order to carry out evidence-based advocacy

The pandemic caused by Covid-19 has been a factor that has increased the vulnerability of the already vulnerable, such as women

    • Therefore, it is recommended to take advantage of this global situation to keep the gender issue in the framework of the post-Covid-19 recovery agenda.
Open Access

"Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives"

Cite paper

M. A., Howland, F., & et al., ‘Examining the Barriers to Gender Integration in Agriculture, Climate Change, Food Security, and Nutrition Policies: Guatemalan and Honduran Perspectives’ 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.664253.

2021 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsFind full paper →DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.664253
Co-authors
Mariola Acosta, Juliana Muriel, Jean-Francois Le Coq
Methodology
This is a qualitative research.

We used a case study approach to analyse the barriers to gender integration in these governments’ policies. Based on semi-structured interviews and policy document analysis, we conducted a methodology based on policy mix, policy integration and policy translation.

Included both narrative and policy document analysis. For the policy document analysis, we identified all policy documents for both countries related to gender, climate change, food security and agriculture. We analysed in which ways they integrated gender in these documents.

For the narrative analysis we conducted interviews with different types of stakeholders, including government bodies (gender and non-gender), and research and international cooperation organisations, civil society organisations to understand the gender gap in these topics at different stages of the policy cycle.

These stages include policy design, policy budgeting, policy implementation, monitoring and evaluation. We analysed these narratives and grouped them by topic. We used four transversal categories to group these narratives: (1) international influence; (2) structural barriers at national level; (3) behavioural and corruption barriers; and (4) knowledge barriers.

A limitation of this research is that they could have interviewed more non-gender individuals, particularly within the government, such as Ministry of Agriculture, ministry of environment or Secretary of Food Security. However, it was very difficult to establish contact and to establish a meeting with such individuals as they feel that gender doesn’t come within their role, instead it is the job of the gender unit.

Funding

This research was funded by an external organisation, but detail has not been provided.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more