Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

  • Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • For policymakers
  • Nepal
  • Brief created: 2022
  • Sign up

Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal

Brief about:

Journal Article (2018)

Open access
Written by:
Doctoral Researcher / Research Assistant | Kathmandu University
Other researchers:
Mahesh Banskota, Sagar Raj Sharma
PrintShare
Cite page
Rana, Hritika. 'Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/examining-agency-in-agriculture-the-feminization-debate-in-nepal/

 This study investigates how women exercise agency within gendered patterns of labour and decision-making in citrus-producing households in Sindhuli, Nepal, offering new insights into the feminization of agriculture by analyzing women’s lived experiences across different agricultural domains.

Women’s lived experiences underscore concerns surrounding evolving gender norms, attitudes and practices around agriculture from an agency perspective.

Women have to choose agricultural tasks based on their adaptive preferences under limited circumstances. Which raises the question of how different women’s lives would be if they did not need to take up livestock rearing.

 

Key findings

  1. Women's mobility is restricted due to responsibility for livestock care.
  2. Men are able to re-enter agriculture, but their activities tend to be limited to market-orientated crops, while women focus on domestic work e.g. livestock care.
    What it means

    This is becoming solely a task for wives/daughter-in-laws, whereas it used to be a shared task.

  3. As men leave, women tend to take care of all household responsibilities, including livestock management, which was previously looked after by both husbands and wives.
    What it means

    But when women leave, women’s work is unattended to by their male counterparts, or is not up to the satisfaction of women, forcing women to take over their responsibilities once again.

Proposed action

  1. Further exploration of the feminisation of livestock in particular and its relation to gendered mobility

    It suggests that there are more factors shaping farm women’s choices within household labour arrangements.     

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to iDE Global

These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

iDE Global Logo
Special thanks to Arianne Zajac for preparation assistance

We would like to extend a special thank you to Arianne Zajac, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal

Cite this brief: Rana, Hritika. 'Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/examining-agency-in-agriculture-the-feminization-debate-in-nepal/

Brief created by: Dr Hritika Rana | Year brief made: 2022

Original research:

  • M. B., Rana, H., & S. R. S., ‘Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal’ 19(3), pp. 32–48 https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol19/iss3/4/. – https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol19/iss3/4/

Research brief:

Women’s lived experiences underscore concerns surrounding evolving gender norms, attitudes and practices around agriculture from an agency perspective. Women have to choose agricultural tasks based on their adaptive preferences under limited circumstances. Which raises the question of how different women‚Äôs lives would be if they did not need to take up livestock rearing.

Women’s lived experiences underscore concerns surrounding evolving gender norms, attitudes and practices around agriculture from an agency perspective.

Women have to choose agricultural tasks based on their adaptive preferences under limited circumstances. Which raises the question of how different women’s lives would be if they did not need to take up livestock rearing.

Findings:

Women’s mobility is restricted due to responsibility for livestock care.

Men are able to re-enter agriculture, but their activities tend to be limited to market-orientated crops, while women focus on domestic work e.g. livestock care.

This is becoming solely a task for wives/daughter-in-laws, whereas it used to be a shared task.

As men leave, women tend to take care of all household responsibilities, including livestock management, which was previously looked after by both husbands and wives.

But when women leave, women’s work is unattended to by their male counterparts, or is not up to the satisfaction of women, forcing women to take over their responsibilities once again.

Advice:

Further exploration of the feminisation of livestock in particular and its relation to gendered mobility

    • It suggests that there are more factors shaping farm women’s choices within household labour arrangements.     
Open Access|Peer Reviewed

"Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal"

Cite paper

M. B., Rana, H., & S. R. S., ‘Examining Agency in Agriculture: The Feminization Debate in Nepal’ 19(3), pp. 32–48 https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol19/iss3/4/.

2018 · Journal of International Women’s Studies · pp. 32-48Find full paper →
Co-authors
Mahesh Banskota, Sagar Raj Sharma
Methodology
This is a qualitative research.

Narrative cases backed by ethnographic study comprised of informal interviews and participant observation. Participant observation, and a biographical narrative interview method (BNIM) were used for data collection and analysis. From 140 individuals interviewed during household screening, three cases have been selected for this paper.

Limitations include that typical purposive case sampling has been used to show the relevance of the phenomenon. Researchers tend to also question this type of sampling as there might be a tendency of researcher bias.

Funding

This research was funded by an external organisation, but detail has not been provided.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more