Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh

Based on:

Journal Article (2001)

Paywalled link

 This paper explores the reasons why recent evaluations of the empowerment potential of credit programs for rural women in Bangladesh have arrived at very conflicting conclusions.

PrintShare
Cite page
Kabeer, Nalia. 'Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/conflicts-over-credit-re-evaluating-the-empowerment-potential-of-loans-to-women-in-rural-bangladesh/
Decent Work and Economic GrowthGender EqualityNo Poverty

Microfinance has become a widely used instrument/approach to addressing simultaneously the poverty of households and the exclusion of these households from opportunities to improve their lives. People also hope that targeting these services to women will empower them. The point of this research was to ask the questions: “Does it do that?” To what extent doesn’t it do that? How far does it go?” This article looks at the strength and the limits of microfinance.

 

Key findings

  • Microfinance has an effect at the individual level, but that it is not a very empowering
  • It is important to be sensitive to how subordinate groups themselves define positive change in their lives, and also that we need to pay attention to the perspective we take when making evaluations about empowerment.

Proposed action

  • Design your evaluation methodologies in ways that take account of other people's perspectives
  • Make sure you're not excluding men
  • In India, Self-Help Group Model

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to iDE Global

These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.

iDE Global Logo
Special thanks to Christina Takayama for preparation assistance

We would like to extend a special thank you to Christina Takayama, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh

Cite this brief: Kabeer, Nalia. 'Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/conflicts-over-credit-re-evaluating-the-empowerment-potential-of-loans-to-women-in-rural-bangladesh/

Brief created by: Professor Nalia Kabeer | Year brief made: 2022

Original research:

  • Kabeer, N., ‘Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh’ 29(1) (pp. 63–84) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00081-4. – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X00000814#aep-keywords-id5

Research brief:

This paper explores the reasons why recent evaluations of the empowerment potential of credit programs for rural women in Bangladesh have arrived at very conflicting conclusions.

Microfinance has become a widely used instrument/approach to addressing simultaneously the poverty of households and the exclusion of these households from opportunities to improve their lives. People also hope that targeting these services to women will empower them. The point of this research was to ask the questions: “Does it do that?” To what extent doesn’t it do that? How far does it go?” This article looks at the strength and the limits of microfinance.

Findings:

Microfinance has an effect at the individual level, but that it is not a very empowering

It is important to be sensitive to how subordinate groups themselves define positive change in their lives, and also that we need to pay attention to the perspective we take when making evaluations about empowerment.

Advice:

Design your evaluation methodologies in ways that take account of other people’s perspectives

    • Don’t rely on a single input to change peoples’ lives.

Make sure you’re not excluding men

    • Lending money to only women will create tensions between genders, making it difficult for women to really benefit from micro-credit lending systems.

In India, Self-Help Group Model

    • savings led rather than credit led. This allows for people to be trained in livelihood, new skills, learning about their own rights, access to banks, knowledge that gives people a sense of self-confidence and empowerment to tackle constraints.
14100
|
2001

"Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh"

Cite paper

Kabeer, N., ‘Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh’ 29(1) (pp. 63–84) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00081-4.

Published in World Development, pp. 63-84.
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00081-4
🔗 Find full paper (Not open access)
Methodology
This is a mixed methods research.
survey

Combined quantitative and qualitative methods, using surveys of men and women. In the surveys tested some of the findings that others have reported, e.g. Who controls the credit? How was the money from income used? Additionally, asked more open ended questions, e.g. What difference has it made in your life? Combined both qualitative and quantitative questions to address ongoing debates in the field and to offer own research findings.

One important warning is to remember this is a single study and you cannot generalise from any single study. This research's findings are a valid evaluation for the specific organisation investigated, however findings must be located within a broader literature about microfinance.



Funding

This research was independently conducted and did not receive funding from outside of the university.

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more