Content
About this brief
Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts
Brief about:
Journal Article (2020)
Written by:
In conflict regions such as Kosovo, Cyprus and Israel, ethnic group members who feel more strongly that the disputed territory belongs to their own group are less willing to reconcile the with the rival outgroup.
In some situations different ethnic groups claim the same territory, for instance Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo, or Jews and Arabs in Israel. These are examples of ‘territorial conflicts’ and one challenge in such conflicts is finding a way for the groups to reconcile. We researched whether people who identify strongly with their group are more likely to claim that their group owns the disputed territory, and whether these ownership beliefs explain why some group members are less open to reconciliation with the other group. It is important to understand these relationships to find ways to foster reconciliation.
What it means
Our findings can help understand why people in conflict regions find it difficult to reconcile with the rival group. When they believe that a territory belongs to their group, this can stand in the way of reconciliation. Our findings further show that a commitment to one’s ethnic group (e.g. feeling Serbian) is related to stronger feelings of territorial ownership, which prevents people from reconciling.
This research can be applied to territorial conflict regions where two or more groups feel that they (rightfully) own the country rather than their conflicting outgroup(s).
It could be an approach to tackle the problem by e.g. NGOs or other reconciliation initiatives which aim at creating e.g. a more inclusive group identification, which should then relate to more inclusive understandings of ownership and to more willingness to reconcile.
Key findings
- We found among Serbs from Serbia, Serbs from Kosovo, Greek Cypriots and Israeli Jews that people who identified more strongly with their group also had a stronger sense of territorial ownership, and this sense of ownership was related to a lower willingness to reconcile.
Proposed action
- Territorial ownership perceptions are widespread in territorial conflicts, this is one of the reasons why they are so difficult to resolve
Creating a narrative of more inclusive, shared ownership might be one way to tackle territorial conflicts, and to induce more reconciliatory attitudes
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts
Cite this brief: Storz, Nora. 'Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/collective-psychological-ownership/
Brief created by: Nora Storz | Year brief made: 2021
Original research:
- B. M., Storz, N., & et al., ‘Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts’ 8(1) (pp. 404–425) https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1145. – https://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/1145
Research brief:
In conflict regions such as Kosovo, Cyprus and Israel, ethnic group members who feel more strongly that the disputed territory belongs to their own group are less willing to reconcile the with the rival outgroup.
In some situations different ethnic groups claim the same territory, for instance Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo, or Jews and Arabs in Israel. These are examples of ‘territorial conflicts’ and one challenge in such conflicts is finding a way for the groups to reconcile. We researched whether people who identify strongly with their group are more likely to claim that their group owns the disputed territory, and whether these ownership beliefs explain why some group members are less open to reconciliation with the other group. It is important to understand these relationships to find ways to foster reconciliation.
Findings:
We found among Serbs from Serbia, Serbs from Kosovo, Greek Cypriots and Israeli Jews that people who identified more strongly with their group also had a stronger sense of territorial ownership, and this sense of ownership was related to a lower willingness to reconcile.
Advice:
Territorial ownership perceptions are widespread in territorial conflicts, this is one of the reasons why they are so difficult to resolve
- Creating a narrative of more inclusive, shared ownership might be one way to tackle territorial conflicts, and to induce more reconciliatory attitudes
Extra:
Our findings can help understand why people in conflict regions find it difficult to reconcile with the rival group. When they believe that a territory belongs to their group, this can stand in the way of reconciliation. Our findings further show that a commitment to one’s ethnic group (e.g. feeling Serbian) is related to stronger feelings of territorial ownership, which prevents people from reconciling.
This research can be applied to territorial conflict regions where two or more groups feel that they (rightfully) own the country rather than their conflicting outgroup(s).
It could be an approach to tackle the problem by e.g. NGOs or other reconciliation initiatives which aim at creating e.g. a more inclusive group identification, which should then relate to more inclusive understandings of ownership and to more willingness to reconcile.