Content
About this brief
Climate Change Adaptation and Gender Inequality: Insights from Rural Vietnam
Brief about:
Journal Article (2019)
Written by:
Other researchers:
This article examines gender, class and age as variables – and shows how these variables can significantly impact the adaption for climate resistant crops. In Vietnam, as women do most the farm labour, by not listening including women, policies and initiatives will fail.
Many initiatives are looking to push the adoption of more climate-resistant agriculture. However, climate incentives have primarily focused on natural systems perspectives, leaving a knowledge gap on how human systems have become vulnerable to and impacted by climate change, not least in terms of gender and how women and men seek to adapt to climate change.
Understanding the impacts of and vulnerabilities to climate change, including social relations and power structures, is vital for determining which types of adaptation strategies could be helpful for specific cases and particular contexts.
Here, gender plays a crucial role in global responses, not only because adaptation is gendered but also because women are affected differently and may perceive climate change in alternate ways to men.
Key findings
- The research shows that farmers in Thái Bình are environmentally vulnerable by living in and being part of communities that are already impacted by climate change.What it means
In addition, they are financially constrained, socially affected, and burdened by increased stressors. However, capacities connected to that vulnerability vary within the community, making certain people more exposed and vulnerable than others, not intrinsically but contingently. Age, class, and gender are clear parameters in the identification and evaluation of vulnerability within the overarching threat of climate change impacts. Increasing labour migration due to farming not being lucrative, in combination with a state-induced pressure on increased production, leaves elderly and female farmers behind both literally, in terms of place (rural agriculture) and in terms of equality and human well-being, leading to or even reinforcing, the feminisation of farming. Meanwhile, women lack rights to and control over resources that they are nonetheless responsible for in terms of outcome. Thus, women are unable to access and contribute to knowledge production in order to alleviate the pressing situation they are in, nor possess the power to participate in or influence policy-making.
- The study argues for gender-informed climate change adaptation that acknowledges a suite of essential conditions, such as the gendering of capacities and impacts, the feminization of farming, an ageing rural generation, and socially differentiated local knowledge and experiences.
- The national strategies and policies that are supposed to increase the adaptation capacity lack a holistic sustainability perspective by not acknowledging site-specific differentiated rights, responsibilities, knowledge generating capacities, and vulnerability.What it means
It is simply not enough to rely on economic instruments or technological solutions, especially when farming livelihoods are continually devalued. Technological solutions fail to address gendered regimes and dynamics, which result in few opportunities and weak sustainable adaptation for farmers, specifically female farmers. If social relations in terms of age, class, gender, and location are not highlighted and considered in national strategies and policies, it will be very difficult to reach social goals and national targets on economic growth, climate response, gender equality, and sustainable development.
Proposed action
- Include all the stakeholders across a project or policy cycle from development to implementation
For example, looking into farming a particular crop, then need to know that everything is interlinked, and there is a need to examine and understand the whole value chain.
- Past and present national strategies and provincial implementation plans linked to climate change do not consider the burden affecting rural female farmers; instead, the focus lies on addressing technical solutions to adaptation
- Gender and justice often get overlooked concerning climate change
Gender, justice and vulnerability are crucial aspects and must be included from the outset to navigate avoidable issues. Including gender does not necessarily mean the whole initiative needs to have a gender focus. Instead, there needs to be some consideration to incorporate aspects and variables from a gendered perspective.
- It is important to know whose knowledge you are collecting
Surveys often yield male-dominated expertise as it is sent to the head of the household to fill, usually male, failing to capture the opinion of women. Rather than requesting the head of the household – a better idea is “the one who is responsible for this work” or separate different groups to navigate the data collection. This way, one can ensure that the data is more representative.
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Acknowledgements
Thank you to iDE Global
These insights were made available thanks to the support of iDE Global, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Climate Change Adaptation and Gender Inequality: Insights from Rural Vietnam
Cite this brief: Ylipaa, Josephine. 'Climate Change Adaptation and Gender Inequality: Insights from Rural Vietnam'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/climate-change-adaptation-and-gender-inequality-insights-from-rural-vietnam/
Brief created by: Dr Josephine Ylipaa | Year brief made: 2022
Original research:
- S. G., Ylipaa, J., & A. J., ‘Climate Change Adaptation and Gender Inequality: Insights from Rural Vietnam’ 11(10) https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102805. – https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2805
Research brief:
This article examines gender, class and age as variables – and shows how these variables can significantly impact the adaption for climate resistant crops. In Vietnam, as women do most the farm labour, by not listening including women, policies and initiatives will fail.
Many initiatives are looking to push the adoption of more climate-resistant agriculture. However, climate incentives have primarily focused on natural systems perspectives, leaving a knowledge gap on how human systems have become vulnerable to and impacted by climate change, not least in terms of gender and how women and men seek to adapt to climate change.
Understanding the impacts of and vulnerabilities to climate change, including social relations and power structures, is vital for determining which types of adaptation strategies could be helpful for specific cases and particular contexts.
Here, gender plays a crucial role in global responses, not only because adaptation is gendered but also because women are affected differently and may perceive climate change in alternate ways to men.
Findings:
The research shows that farmers in Thái Bình are environmentally vulnerable by living in and being part of communities that are already impacted by climate change.
In addition, they are financially constrained, socially affected, and burdened by increased stressors. However, capacities connected to that vulnerability vary within the community, making certain people more exposed and vulnerable than others, not intrinsically but contingently. Age, class, and gender are clear parameters in the identification and evaluation of vulnerability within the overarching threat of climate change impacts. Increasing labour migration due to farming not being lucrative, in combination with a state-induced pressure on increased production, leaves elderly and female farmers behind both literally, in terms of place (rural agriculture) and in terms of equality and human well-being, leading to or even reinforcing, the feminisation of farming. Meanwhile, women lack rights to and control over resources that they are nonetheless responsible for in terms of outcome. Thus, women are unable to access and contribute to knowledge production in order to alleviate the pressing situation they are in, nor possess the power to participate in or influence policy-making.
The study argues for gender-informed climate change adaptation that acknowledges a suite of essential conditions, such as the gendering of capacities and impacts, the feminization of farming, an ageing rural generation, and socially differentiated local knowledge and experiences.
The national strategies and policies that are supposed to increase the adaptation capacity lack a holistic sustainability perspective by not acknowledging site-specific differentiated rights, responsibilities, knowledge generating capacities, and vulnerability.
It is simply not enough to rely on economic instruments or technological solutions, especially when farming livelihoods are continually devalued. Technological solutions fail to address gendered regimes and dynamics, which result in few opportunities and weak sustainable adaptation for farmers, specifically female farmers. If social relations in terms of age, class, gender, and location are not highlighted and considered in national strategies and policies, it will be very difficult to reach social goals and national targets on economic growth, climate response, gender equality, and sustainable development.
Advice:
Include all the stakeholders across a project or policy cycle from development to implementation
- For example, looking into farming a particular crop, then need to know that everything is interlinked, and there is a need to examine and understand the whole value chain.
Past and present national strategies and provincial implementation plans linked to climate change do not consider the burden affecting rural female farmers; instead, the focus lies on addressing technical solutions to adaptation
Gender and justice often get overlooked concerning climate change
- Gender, justice and vulnerability are crucial aspects and must be included from the outset to navigate avoidable issues. Including gender does not necessarily mean the whole initiative needs to have a gender focus. Instead, there needs to be some consideration to incorporate aspects and variables from a gendered perspective.
It is important to know whose knowledge you are collecting
- Surveys often yield male-dominated expertise as it is sent to the head of the household to fill, usually male, failing to capture the opinion of women. Rather than requesting the head of the household – a better idea is “the one who is responsible for this work” or separate different groups to navigate the data collection. This way, one can ensure that the data is more representative.