Content
About this brief
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure- Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
- North Korea
- Sign up
“Business for Peace” (B4P): can this new global governance paradigm of the United Nations Global Compact bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula?
Brief about:
Journal Article (2019)
Written by:
Other researchers:
Is there a way to bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula with the power of business? I argue it is possible, and the article outlines the way forward.
The UN global compact is an initiative that encompasses 15,000 companies across 160 countries. Its main goal is to advance human rights using the power of business. For the past 20 years, we have been witnessing a paradigm shift. Traditionally, the assumption was that what’s good for business is good for society. However, most companies I work with nowadays say that what’s good for society is good for business. This article looks at the Kaesong Industrial complex, a complex for business and companies set up in 2002, and asks the question of whether it can help foster human rights and peace between North and South Korea. The project has been halted since the use of nuclear weapons by North Korea, and the article grapples with what the best way forward is.
The main argument put forward is that, at its core, the conflict between North and South Korea is one over ideology and power. The leadership of North Korea sees itself as a revolutionary socialist state, and it is dedicated to keeping a tight grip over the country’s cultural life. However, North Korea also stands to benefit from the economic activity and stability provided by the Kaesong industrial complex. Therefore, it is important to develop the project and find a way to convince North Korean leadership of its value.
The way forward outlined by the article rests upon an incremental denuclearisation of North Korea. This process needs to happen one step at a time, without rush. The main benefit for North Korea’s leadership and Kin Jong Un would be that the country would be much more stable and easy to run if the leadership were to develop the life of its people, and provide them with decent employment and living conditions.
Key findings
- North Korea also stands to benefit from the economic activity and stability provided by the Kaesong industrial complex
Proposed action
- When working in a conflict ridden areas, you have to work in stages, with an incremental approach
Its not going to work in you say to North Korean for example "Before we can negotiate, you have to give up all nuclear weapons programmes".
- This staging process needs to be used to build trust. You need to use a reciprocal approach
"You do a little, we do a little".
- The conflict area needs to take transparent steps to advance human rights
They need to be incremental, but also transparent, so that progress can be monitored and there can be accountability.
- A good example is Burma (Myanmar)
After the military dictatorship was overthrown, we encouraged companies to go in and do business, both because there were plentiful available resources and because we thought it would be good for the society. There were no indications that the military government would return, but when they did, most companies left. Still, it was a good attempt, and that's the main takeaway. It's a good idea to try having companies do business in any conflict ridden part of the world.
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Acknowledgements
Thank you to ASEAN
These insights were made available thanks to the support of ASEAN, who are committed to the dissemination of knowledge for all.
Special thanks to Antoine Germain for preparation assistance
We would like to extend a special thank you to Antoine Germain, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
“Business for Peace” (B4P): can this new global governance paradigm of the United Nations Global Compact bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula?
Cite this brief: Williams, Oliver. '“Business for Peace” (B4P): can this new global governance paradigm of the United Nations Global Compact bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula?'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/business-for-peace-b4p-can-this-new-global-governance-paradigm-of-the-united-nations-global-compact-bring-some-peace-and-stability-to-the-korean-peninsula/
Brief created by: Professor Oliver Williams | Year brief made:
Original research:
- S. Y.-S. P., & Williams, O., ‘Business for Peace” (B4P): can this new global governance paradigm of the United Nations Global Compact bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula?’ 8 (pp. 173–193) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-019-00093-4. – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13520-019-00093-4
Research brief:
Is there a way to bring some peace and stability to the Korean peninsula with the power of business? I argue it is possible, and the article outlines the way forward.
The UN global compact is an initiative that encompasses 15,000 companies across 160 countries. Its main goal is to advance human rights using the power of business. For the past 20 years, we have been witnessing a paradigm shift. Traditionally, the assumption was that what’s good for business is good for society. However, most companies I work with nowadays say that what’s good for society is good for business. This article looks at the Kaesong Industrial complex, a complex for business and companies set up in 2002, and asks the question of whether it can help foster human rights and peace between North and South Korea. The project has been halted since the use of nuclear weapons by North Korea, and the article grapples with what the best way forward is.
The main argument put forward is that, at its core, the conflict between North and South Korea is one over ideology and power. The leadership of North Korea sees itself as a revolutionary socialist state, and it is dedicated to keeping a tight grip over the country’s cultural life. However, North Korea also stands to benefit from the economic activity and stability provided by the Kaesong industrial complex. Therefore, it is important to develop the project and find a way to convince North Korean leadership of its value.
The way forward outlined by the article rests upon an incremental denuclearisation of North Korea. This process needs to happen one step at a time, without rush. The main benefit for North Korea’s leadership and Kin Jong Un would be that the country would be much more stable and easy to run if the leadership were to develop the life of its people, and provide them with decent employment and living conditions.
Findings:
North Korea also stands to benefit from the economic activity and stability provided by the Kaesong industrial complex
Advice:
When working in a conflict ridden areas, you have to work in stages, with an incremental approach
- Its not going to work in you say to North Korean for example “Before we can negotiate, you have to give up all nuclear weapons programmes”.
This staging process needs to be used to build trust. You need to use a reciprocal approach
- “You do a little, we do a little”.
The conflict area needs to take transparent steps to advance human rights
- They need to be incremental, but also transparent, so that progress can be monitored and there can be accountability.
A good example is Burma (Myanmar)
- After the military dictatorship was overthrown, we encouraged companies to go in and do business, both because there were plentiful available resources and because we thought it would be good for the society. There were no indications that the military government would return, but when they did, most companies left. Still, it was a good attempt, and that’s the main takeaway. It’s a good idea to try having companies do business in any conflict ridden part of the world.