Find evidence, practical ideas and fresh insight for greater impact

  • Gender Equality
  • Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  • For policymakers
  • Brief created: 2025
  • Sign up

Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies

Brief about:

Journal Article (2025)

Open access
Written by:
Other researchers:
Lucía Estevan-Reina, Ángel del Fresno-Díaz, Finn Frohn, Stephen Wright, Soledad de Lemus
PrintShare
Cite page
Galván Hernández, Danna. 'Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/bridging-the-divide-understanding-the-psychological-factors-influencing-feminist-womens-support-to-transgender-related-policies/

 The aim of this research was to examine the antecedent of feminist ciswomen’s support for pro- and anti- trans actions within the University community during the approval of the Trans Law (Law 04/3023) in Spain. This research is relevant for policymakers, activists that seek to promote peacebuilding and inclisvity without triggering threat or zero-sum beliefs between trans people’s rights and ciswomen.

The demand for trans people’s institutional rights and
the approval of the Trans Law (Law 04/3023) has polarized
the feminist movement in Spain. In this contentious
context, our studies examined the relationship between
feminist identity and support for, or opposition to, trans
rights among the University community.

 

Key findings

  1. Studies were run in a real-life legal change advancing trans rights
    Evidence

    Studies were run during the approval of the Trans Law as Figure 2 shows

    What it means

    We conducted the studies in a historical moment in Spanish LGBTIQA+ history.

  2. Feminist identification promotes cooperation with trans people in ciswomen.
    Evidence

    In Study 1a, 2, and 3, we found a significant positive correlation between feminist identification and pro-trans collective action intentions.

    What it means

    Feminist identification is related to solidarity with the trans community in our sample.

  3. High ideological threat perception might dissuade ciswomen who identify as feminist from supporting trans rights.
    Evidence

    Although the interaction was significant in both studies (Study 1a: b = .06, 95% CI [.02, .10], p = .002; Study 1b: b = −.11, 95% CI [−.17, −.04], p = .001), the patterns differed notably between them, particularly among participants reporting higher perceived threat.

    What it means

    People that have high perception of threat towards trans rights have negative attitudes regarding them, eventhough they identify as feminists.

  4. The exposure of narratives of conflict (vs. cooperation) enhances people's endorsement of zero-sum beliefs and reactive threat, which in turn predict more support for anti-trans collective actions and less support for actions advancing trans rights.
    Evidence

    Participants exposed to the high threat message reported more reactive threat than those exposed to the low threat message (t(397) = −2.77; p = .006, d = −.30 (Hypothesis 2; see

    Table 4)). There was no significant effect of the manipulation on pro-trans or anti-trans collective action intentions (pro-trans: t(402) = 1.97; p = .050, d = .20; anti-trans: t(403) = −.96; p = .337, d = −.10).

    What it means

    This means that the mere exposure to messages of narratives of conflict betweehn feminists and the aims of the trans community can make people feel more threatened and endorse more anti-trans actions.

  5. We propose a series of win-win strategies to guarantee trans rights in the context of a Spanish university while not triggering threats nor zero-sum beliefs in ciswomen.
    Evidence

    Given the current findings, developing win-win strategies that promote solidarity and support for trans rights while addressing perceived threats and divisive narratives is crucial. In what

    follows, we suggest practical measures for the University of Granada to meet the Trans Law requirements while reducing reactive threat and zero-sum beliefs among cisgender women. Leveraging the current equity protocol, particularly Objective 8 concerning “LGBTQ+ people” (University of Granada, 2019), we propose the following strategies. It is essential to continuously monitor their effectiveness and anticipate unintended consequences through data collection on the well-being

    of cisgender and transgender individuals, along with policy

    reviews (see Table 5).

    What it means

    We propose strategies to practically implement the reduction of conflict in applyhing the proposed Trans Law.

Proposed action

  1. Implement win-win strategies in policy-making in order to avoid feelings of threat and zero-sum beliefs

    Provide counseling services and access to information on well-being for ciswomen and transgender individuals, recognizing the different needs faced by them

Comments

You must log in to ask a question
 

Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.

Already have an account? Log in
Share

Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies

Cite this brief: Galván Hernández, Danna. 'Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/bridging-the-divide-understanding-the-psychological-factors-influencing-feminist-womens-support-to-transgender-related-policies/

Brief created by: Danna Galván Hernández | Year brief made: 2025

Original research:

  • Estevan-Reina, L., Galván Hernández, D., & et al., ‘Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies’ 0(00) (pp. 1–25) https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70032. – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pops.70032

Research brief:

The aim of this research was to examine the antecedent of feminist ciswomen’s support for pro- and anti- trans actions within the University community during the approval of the Trans Law (Law 04/3023) in Spain. This research is relevant for policymakers, activists that seek to promote peacebuilding and inclisvity without triggering threat or zero-sum beliefs…

The demand for trans people’s institutional rights and
the approval of the Trans Law (Law 04/3023) has polarized
the feminist movement in Spain. In this contentious
context, our studies examined the relationship between
feminist identity and support for, or opposition to, trans
rights among the University community.

Findings:

Studies were run in a real-life legal change advancing trans rights

Studies were run during the approval of the Trans Law as Figure 2 shows

We conducted the studies in a historical moment in Spanish LGBTIQA+ history.

Feminist identification promotes cooperation with trans people in ciswomen.

In Study 1a, 2, and 3, we found a significant positive correlation between feminist identification and pro-trans collective action intentions.

Feminist identification is related to solidarity with the trans community in our sample.

High ideological threat perception might dissuade ciswomen who identify as feminist from supporting trans rights.

Although the interaction was significant in both studies (Study 1a: b = .06, 95% CI [.02, .10], p = .002; Study 1b: b = −.11, 95% CI [−.17, −.04], p = .001), the patterns differed notably between them, particularly among participants reporting higher perceived threat.

People that have high perception of threat towards trans rights have negative attitudes regarding them, eventhough they identify as feminists.

The exposure of narratives of conflict (vs. cooperation) enhances people’s endorsement of zero-sum beliefs and reactive threat, which in turn predict more support for anti-trans collective actions and less support for actions advancing trans rights.

Participants exposed to the high threat message reported more reactive threat than those exposed to the low threat message (t(397) = −2.77; p = .006, d = −.30 (Hypothesis 2; see

Table 4)). There was no significant effect of the manipulation on pro-trans or anti-trans collective action intentions (pro-trans: t(402) = 1.97; p = .050, d = .20; anti-trans: t(403) = −.96; p = .337, d = −.10).

This means that the mere exposure to messages of narratives of conflict betweehn feminists and the aims of the trans community can make people feel more threatened and endorse more anti-trans actions.

We propose a series of win-win strategies to guarantee trans rights in the context of a Spanish university while not triggering threats nor zero-sum beliefs in ciswomen.

Given the current findings, developing win-win strategies that promote solidarity and support for trans rights while addressing perceived threats and divisive narratives is crucial. In what

follows, we suggest practical measures for the University of Granada to meet the Trans Law requirements while reducing reactive threat and zero-sum beliefs among cisgender women. Leveraging the current equity protocol, particularly Objective 8 concerning “LGBTQ+ people” (University of Granada, 2019), we propose the following strategies. It is essential to continuously monitor their effectiveness and anticipate unintended consequences through data collection on the well-being

of cisgender and transgender individuals, along with policy

reviews (see Table 5).

We propose strategies to practically implement the reduction of conflict in applyhing the proposed Trans Law.

Advice:

Implement win-win strategies in policy-making in order to avoid feelings of threat and zero-sum beliefs

Open Access|Peer Reviewed

"Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women's support to transgender related policies"

DownloadCite paper

Estevan-Reina, L., Galván Hernández, D., & et al., ‘Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women’s support to transgender related policies’ 0(00) (pp. 1–25) https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70032.

2025 · Political Psychology · pp. 1-25Find full paper →DOI: 10.1111/pops.70032
Co-authors
Lucía Estevan-Reina, Ángel del Fresno-Díaz, Finn Frohn, Stephen Wright, Soledad de Lemus
Methodology
This is a quantitative study.

Two correlational studies (Study 1a = 317; Study 1b = 323) conducted before the law's passage provided opposing results regarding the association between feminist identity and support
for trans rights. Building upon these findings, two experimental studies (Study 2 N = 415; Study 3 N = 405) exposed ciswomen to cooperation or conflict narratives and examined their impact on reactive threat, zero-sum beliefs, and support for pro-trans or anti-trans collective actions. Conflict

Funding

MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 ERDF/EU, Grant/Award Number: PID2022.141182NB.I00; MUNI, Grant/ Award Number: FPU21/03042; University of Granada, Grant/Award Number: UCE-PP2023-11; CEX2023-001312-M/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and UCEPP2023- 11/UGR

Your research brief is live

It’s now visible on your profile and searchable by practitioners. Thank you for making your work accessible to decision-makers who need it

Close

Your research brief was updated

Changes are live now. 

Close

Your account is pending verification

We’ve been notified and will review it shortly. Once verified, it will be published and visible to practitioners.

We have this email on file: . If this isn’t your work email, update it to speed things up.

Update email

Your draft has been saved

Your draft has been saved. You can return to edit and publish it anytime from your dashboard.

Close

Thank you for subscribing!

We’d love to know who we will be talking to, could you take a moment to share a few more details?

Thanks for signing up!
If you haven’t already, create a free account to access expert insights and be part of a global effort to improve real-world decisions.

Get started

Close

For researchers

Turn your paper into a practical brief practitioners will read.

Sign up freeLearn more

For professionals

Explore free briefs, and book a call for deeper insights when you need them.

Talk with the teamLearn more