Anti-corruption commissions: lessons from the Asia-Pacific region for a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog
Based on:
Journal Article (2019)
This research presents an overview of six anti-corruption commissions that are present in the Asia-Pacific region in order to compare the experience of regulatory efforts to address corruption and its effects. The cases are used to discuss Australia’s attempts to create a similar body.
Brief by:
Research collaborators:
Content
In 2019, Australia was yet to establish a national anti-corruption commission despite strong public support for its establishment. Thus, it is useful to assess the same process in countries that have already gone through this institutional development and determine their successes and challenges in doing so. This paper also looks at political culture, political integrity and a national integrity ecosystem.
The establishment of national anti-corruption bodies in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand were discussed in this paper.
Key findings
Primary data was collated from the anti-corruption websites of each anti-corruption commission and comparisons were made with respect to its remit and private sector oversight.
Proposed action
In order to obtain legitimacy for anti-corruption committees, civil society must be involved
In addition to existing information platforms, use social media actively! Social media is where the audience is
Ensure a strong independent judiciary to deal with corruption cases
Embed a culture of integrity at the political level for all publicly-elected and publicly-appointed officials
Ensure that private corporations are held accountable, especially multinational corporations that have enormous financial power
This research is a comparative study that can be applied to other regions around the world
Comments
You must log in to ask a question
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Kirsti Sletten for preparation assistance
We would like to extend a special thank you to Kirsti Sletten, for their invaluable contribution in assisting the preparation of this research summary.
Are you a researcher looking to make a real-world impact? Join Acume and transform your research into a practical summary.
Already have an account? Log in
Discover more
Anti-corruption commissions: lessons from the Asia-Pacific region for a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog
Cite this brief: dela Rama, Marie. 'Anti-corruption commissions: lessons from the Asia-Pacific region for a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog'. Acume. https://www.acume.org/r/anti-corruption-commissions-lessons-for-the-asia-pacific-region-from-a-proposed-australian-federal-anti-corruption-watchdog/
Brief created by: Dr Marie dela Rama | Year brief made: 2022
Original research:
- M. L., & dela Rama, M., ‘Anti-corruption commissions: lessons from the Asia-Pacific region for a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog’ 25(4) (pp. 571–599) https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589971. – https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/132039/4/APBR%2BCorruption%2B10%2BFebruary%2B2019.pdf
Research brief:
This research presents an overview of six anti-corruption commissions that are present in the Asia-Pacific region in order to compare the experience of regulatory efforts to address corruption and its effects. The cases are used to discuss Australia’s attempts to create a similar body.
In 2019, Australia was yet to establish a national anti-corruption commission despite strong public support for its establishment. Thus, it is useful to assess the same process in countries that have already gone through this institutional development and determine their successes and challenges in doing so. This paper also looks at political culture, political integrity and a national integrity ecosystem.
The establishment of national anti-corruption bodies in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand were discussed in this paper.
Findings:
Primary data was collated from the anti-corruption websites of each anti-corruption commission and comparisons were made with respect to its remit and private sector oversight.
Advice:
In order to obtain legitimacy for anti-corruption committees, civil society must be involved
In addition to existing information platforms, use social media actively! Social media is where the audience is
- Social media helps to involve civil society and uncover corrupt tendencies among publicly elected and appointed officials. Social media accounts have been created by anti-corruption institutions and anti-corruption public officials to encourage anti-corrupt practices.
Ensure a strong independent judiciary to deal with corruption cases
- One way to help this task is to establish a multilateral anti-corruption committee for the region to help ensure a fair prosecution in cases of grand corruption, such as an International Anti-Corruption Court.
Embed a culture of integrity at the political level for all publicly-elected and publicly-appointed officials
Ensure that private corporations are held accountable, especially multinational corporations that have enormous financial power
- Multinationals should adhere to best practice standards and avoid engaging in corrupt practices that undermine or may cause offence to civil society in their host countries.
This research is a comparative study that can be applied to other regions around the world
- As a study of anti-corruption commissions, this research can be easily replicated by surveying countries’ public institutions. Further research could enhance cross-regional comparisons.