About this research
This research was funded by an external organisation, but detail has not been provided.
Recommended for
The goal of interventions should not necessarily be to make women more autonomous, but to be better coordinated with their husbands in ways that they see as fair and equitable.
There is a discrepancy between the perception and reality of gendered roles in farming. The narrative of global and international policies assumes that wives are responsible for providing food for the family, while husbands commercialize the farm.
Contrary to the consensus, it was found in this context that male smallholders held responsibility for providing food to their families, as part of being a good husband or a good man. When women are providing food, it indicates that something is wrong, their husbands cannot meet their needs, which was largely due to agricultural commercialization and envrionmental changes. There are gendered-disparities in access to farm and food resources and land, but men and women are not autonomous agents; in cooperative households, labor is divided and negotiated to ensure household needs are met, subject to bargaining power imbalances.
Under the policy assumption that food provisioning is the woman’s role, reallocation programs that target women for credit, land, fertilizer and seed can lead to additional burdens on women, and intra-household conflict. In the case study, some women supported by the project did not want to top up the husbands provisions, as food provisioning was not viewed as their responsibility.
On the other hand, commercialization programmes and policy supported by donors and development actors largely focus on men, and can lead to short term-profit seeking to pay back credit or to increase scale at the cost of agrobiodiversity and food security. Some participants make a lot of money from these contract agreements, but others cannot; leading to land competition and disputes within communities and households.
This competition and conflict results from inadequate context-specific research from practitioners before designing interventions. In the context of climate change, gender-roles are shifting rapidly so even research 5-10 years ago may be insufficient.
The goal of interventions should not necessarily be to make women more autonomous, but to be better coordinated with their husbands in ways that they see as fair and equitable.
Case study of two agricultural communities in the Northern region of Ghana
Context-immersive study with 6/7 years of iteration to re-evaluate guides and tools. Two field visits for 3 months at a time living in and participating within communities & learning about contextual systems and politics.
In depth interviews in 2 commmunities across several community demographics and other actors in the agricultural supply chain. Over 100 interviews, including interviews with various development project staff, 12 gender-split focus groups. Community resource mapping, defining gender norms, empowerment, household roles, and the future of food and farming.
This is a case study of one area that may not extrapolate across the wider region of Ghana.
Female-headed households and other kinds of households were not investigated.
The study is subject to selection bias of projects and individuals operating in that particular area
| Concept | Definition |
|---|---|
| Negotiative conflict/cooperative bargaining | Cooperation and bargaining between women and men in households, subject to power imbalances and heavily specific on individual family contexts. This negotiation can also happen with community leaders, tractor operators, family members, extension agents |
| Social Differentiation | Inequality based on social, economic and ecological factors |
| Modernization of Agriculture | Commercialization of agriculture to a profit-driven system, over household food consumption, nutrition and agrobiodiversity. Short term goals over long term goals and insensitive to environmental issues |
Vercillo, Siera (2020). The complicated gendering of farming and household food responsibilities in northern Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 235–245.