Migration alters the gender relations and balance of power in families but has mixed results in terms of women’s empowerment. Many of the women in Alexandria reported a greater sense of autonomy and equality that they attribute to earning their own income, as well as no longer tolerating behaviour associated with machismo in their relationships or their husbands’ philandering. However, the women still faced discrimination in the labour market due to their sex and their foreign, often undocumented status.
Although these migrant women had an increased sense of empowerment due to wage-earning and remitting, there were also new forms of dependence resulting from their precarious legal position and economic vulnerability, leading to their disempowerment.
Most remittance recipients in Nacaome, almost always female, did not report great changes in their lives that could be interpreted as a process of empowerment. However, most do feel greater security because of the stable remittance income, which has improved their families’ living conditions, even though they have had to sacrifice in terms of their own relationships, longer work days in cases where they have taken on the migrant’s productive activities, and conflicts with their in-laws.
‘Remittance for development’ initiatives ignore the reasons for migration in the first place and the needs of the migrants and their families. They also perpetuate old paradigms of development practice by instrumentalising migrants and their families, rather than empowering them. Migration cannot be counted on as a sustainable means of development, given its dependence on women’s unpaid labour, increasingly restrictive migration policies, and need for continued migration and remittances.